you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (47 children)

Compared with not transitioning.

[–]Questionable 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (46 children)

Yes. Did you see the link? Because I know what you are comparing it too. But the outcome is suicide. Is that your "best outcome" in your comparison?

???<------------- See that? That's a link. You click on it!

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (45 children)

Oh for fucks sake. Do you want to read your own fucking link, or do we need to go through which two groups it is comparing together?

[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (44 children)

No. I just wish for you to comprehend. I'm not asking a lot I know. But it is what I wish for.

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (43 children)

So when I say "compared to not transitioning" I mean that the transitioning has better outcomes than not transitioning.

The reason I said that is that your link, which I clicked on does not compare transitioning with not transitioning. It just looks at interpersonal factors related to suicide in transgender people.

I see you didn't pick this up, because you mistook my comment for an irrelevant one.

You should read your own links before assuming I haven't, because it exposes you for an idiot.

[–]Questionable 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (42 children)

So when I say "compared to not transitioning" I mean that the transitioning has better outcomes than not transitioning.

Yes. And since the outcome is suicide. You are in fact stating the optimal outcome is suicide.

This isn't in fact hard to understand. Do you not understand what you are claiming?

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (41 children)

Yes. And since the outcome is suicide. You are in fact stating the optimal outcome is suicide.

No, that is reduced by transitioning. As over 50 studies show.

This isn't in fact hard to understand. Do you not understand what you are claiming?

You just made up some bullshit, that is the opposite of the truth, Questionable. What is it that you think I don't understand?

[–]Questionable 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (39 children)

Yes, studies paid for with ESG funds meant to push an agenda, and undercut nations. People were paid for these directed outcomes by fiscal systems based on enslaving mankind. As for what you don't understand, it's that you can create false narratives and social interactions by misusing languages and defintions. Oh that, and apparently all else that comprised humanity and mankind.

Or in short, e͎̜̙͈̰͕̫̲̮̭̟͕̮v̞e̱͚͖̭̜̥̣r̳̰̣͈͙̫̻̰⅄̊͋̀̐̾͑ͭ̆ͩ͑thi̙n̺̖̳͓̜̜g̜̞...

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (38 children)

What "ESG" funds were used for the Dutch study?

How much?

[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (37 children)

I'll be asking the Questions here! Thank you!

So you are telling me who's funds were used? And guaranteeing it wasn't a shell company or false front? How much was based on assumptions and assumed common sense? How does a study in Finland relate to all other societies with their own unique structures in the world? Does the base logic even translate across languages? Do you understand the level of corruption in finances, as all fiat is based on debt, ensuring that the holder of the currency is literally paying for their own enslavement, turning the world into a Skinner box of sorts? Does it make sense for a billion years of evolution to suddenly go wrong because we invented basic tools such as the wrist watch and the power loom, causing the need to cut off our own genitals to become well? Why can't there be effeminate men without the need to chop off their reproductive organs? You acknowledge ESG funds as bad. Why?

[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

How conversations work.