Wait a minute - aren't these the same Democrats whose Supreme Court nominee just told us she can't tell us what a "woman" is because she's not a biologist?

submitted by Chipit from files.catbox.moe

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Chipit[S] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

Woman (n.): adult human female

See how easy that was? Supposedly it was a "trick question"? In what way?

And seriously, allowing your Trump Derangement Syndrome to spill out into public like that? It's embarrassing.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Your Trump comment is idiotic.

Your definition of a woman too narrow. She was asked for a LEGAL answer, which is more than you've suggested here. Read: https://slate.com/human-interest/2017/09/why-a-controversial-definition-of-the-word-woman-doesnt-necessarily-mean-the-dictionary-is-sexist.html

[–]DirewolfGhost 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Too narrow for what? Biology? You're anti-science and anti-logic and everyhuman knows that, bot. Work on your algorithms.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Seems that went way over your head. Hence I must be a bot. Read the Slate article.

[–]Chipit[S] 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Woman (n.): adult human female.

See how easy that was?

You brought up Trump out of nowhere so you could bash him. That's textbook TDS.