you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Vulptex 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

So you think being able to kill others for your convenience is a human right?

Because otherwise how would not letting pregnant women do so be seeing them as not people?

[–]AcceleratedWallops 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

"convenience"? Fucking hell man, have you ever met a pregnant woman? Have you ever even talked to a woman?

[–]Vulptex 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

You don't get to kill someone for any reason, unless they're being a threat and you need to act quickly. That won't fly in any other case, so why is it suddenly okay when it's a woman and her baby?

[–]AcceleratedWallops 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

In the first place, the "baby" is only able to survive by leeching nutrients from the woman. From inside the woman's body. How do you feel about castle doctrine?

Also the baby was brandishing a gun

[–]Vulptex 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yes, because a pregnancy is more harmful than being killed.