use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
advanced search: by author, sub...
~3 users here now
***REDDIT MELTDOWN WATCH*** ROE VS WADE ABOUT TO BE OVERTURNED
submitted 1 year ago by Tarrock from self.MeanwhileOnReddit
view the rest of the comments →
[–][deleted] 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun - 1 year ago (9 children)
It's obviously a big deal. It will automatically make abortion illegal in 22 states.
[–]Norseman_Horseman 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun - 1 year ago (8 children)
Good. Murdering babies is wrong.
[–]AcceleratedWallops 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun - 1 year ago (7 children)
But government deciding what people can do with their bodies is ok?
True goals of this: 1. Organ harvesting 2. Inflating the labor supply to keep wages down
[–]Vulptex 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 1 year ago (6 children)
There are two bodies (or more), and only one of them is hers.
[–]AcceleratedWallops 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun - 1 year ago (5 children)
"women are incubators, not people", a classic
[–]Vulptex 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 1 year ago (4 children)
So you think being able to kill others for your convenience is a human right?
Because otherwise how would not letting pregnant women do so be seeing them as not people?
[–]AcceleratedWallops 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 1 year ago (3 children)
"convenience"? Fucking hell man, have you ever met a pregnant woman? Have you ever even talked to a woman?
[–]Vulptex 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 1 year ago (2 children)
You don't get to kill someone for any reason, unless they're being a threat and you need to act quickly. That won't fly in any other case, so why is it suddenly okay when it's a woman and her baby?
[–]AcceleratedWallops 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 1 year ago (1 child)
In the first place, the "baby" is only able to survive by leeching nutrients from the woman. From inside the woman's body. How do you feel about castle doctrine?
Also the baby was brandishing a gun
[–]Vulptex 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 1 year ago (0 children)
Yes, because a pregnancy is more harmful than being killed.
view the rest of the comments →
[–][deleted] 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun - (9 children)
[–]Norseman_Horseman 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun - (8 children)
[–]AcceleratedWallops 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun - (7 children)
[–]Vulptex 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (6 children)
[–]AcceleratedWallops 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun - (5 children)
[–]Vulptex 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (4 children)
[–]AcceleratedWallops 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (3 children)
[–]Vulptex 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (2 children)
[–]AcceleratedWallops 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (1 child)
[–]Vulptex 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)