you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

might be fake news because I went to r/worldnews and there is an article about this like ten threads down so maybe they just deleted that one so someone else can get the karma

[–]magnora7[S] 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

That could be. But there also exists the soft censorship of deleting a peaking story as it's rising over a technicality, but then allowing later replacements that will never get as high. It probably limits the visibility of the story by 70% as it'll never hit the top spot again, but no one can technically cry censorship as it's still being allowed. It's a smart form of soft censorship without ruffling too many feathers. Not sure if that's what's happening here but it's possible

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

good point

they might also soon delete the other thread if it gets too popular, and keep deleting them like a wack a mole

[–]magnora7[S] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Yup. And then they may even reinstate some of them later after it doesn't matter anymore, and then go "Look, we didn't censor anything". There's a lot of very subtle manipulation happening on reddit, in addition to the overt manipulation