use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
advanced search: by author, sub...
~1 user here now
/r/MGTOW banned
submitted 2 years ago by Vulptex from reddit.com
view the rest of the comments →
[–]NeedMoreCoffee 20 insightful - 3 fun20 insightful - 2 fun21 insightful - 2 fun21 insightful - 3 fun - 2 years ago (7 children)
What utter bullshit.
Feminism exists because women were treated as no little more than breed slaves with no rights to vote, inherit, own property, open bank accounts, etc There were even laws as to how much you could beat your wife like a stick a thumb wide was considered adaquate.
And if you think feminism is no longer needed just look at the latest bullshit like Hubbard or the whole Blizzard fiasco.
Stop acting like youre a male victim and women have it better. Because what? You don't have 6 ft blokes grabbing your ass randomly when you are on the bus?
[–]FoxySDT 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 2 years ago (6 children)
What world do you live in? Where the hell did you even read these things? This is crazy even for usual feminist talking points. Why are so many people upvoting this?
[–]NeedMoreCoffee 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 2 years ago (5 children)
It's called the real world. You should try it sometime.
[–]FoxySDT 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 2 years ago (4 children)
You have no idea what you are talking about Almost everything you said was wrong. Domestic violence cases were regularly persecuted in courts, most women opposed suffragette movement, there is no bloke grabbing you ass. Feminists were pushing it enough with the catlling shit but this is just nonsense. Stop pretending to be such a victim all the time.
[–]NeedMoreCoffee 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 2 years ago (3 children)
LMAO
[–]FoxySDT 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 2 years ago* (2 children)
According to the conventional domestic violence narrative, judges historically have ignored or even shielded “wife beaters” as a result of the patriarchal prioritization of privacy in the home. This Article directly challenges that account. In the early twentieth century, judges regularly and enthusiastically protected female victims of domestic violence in the divorce and criminal contexts. As legal and economic developments appeared to threaten American manhood and traditional family structures, judges intervened in domestic violence matters as substitute patriarchs. They harshly condemned male perpetrators — sentencing men to fines, prison, and even the whipping post
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2589941
IN 1895 the women of Massachusetts were asked by the state whether they wished the suffrage. Of the 575,000 voting women in the state, only 22,204 cared for it enough to deposit in a ballot box an affirmative answer to this question. That is, in round numbers, less than four per cent wished to vote; about ninety-six per cent were opposed to woman suffrage or indifferent to it.
https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/1903/09/why-women-do-not-wish-the-suffrage/306616/
Similarly, the anti-suffragette movement was predominantly female movement:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-suffragism#Notable_people
Kinda weird that the supposed "breeding slaves" with "no rights" were so comfortable with their position.
Also, women reported being happier in 1970s than they do now:
https://www.nber.org/papers/w14969
Also pretty strange since they should be happier as they gained "more rights" over time.
[–]NeedMoreCoffee 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 2 years ago (1 child)
HAHAHA
[–]FoxySDT 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 2 years ago (0 children)
Just so you know, forced laughter is not an effective tool against cognitive dissonance.
view the rest of the comments →
[–]NeedMoreCoffee 20 insightful - 3 fun20 insightful - 2 fun21 insightful - 2 fun21 insightful - 3 fun - (7 children)
[–]FoxySDT 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (6 children)
[–]NeedMoreCoffee 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (5 children)
[–]FoxySDT 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (4 children)
[–]NeedMoreCoffee 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (3 children)
[–]FoxySDT 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (2 children)
[–]NeedMoreCoffee 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (1 child)
[–]FoxySDT 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)