you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Chipit 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

Personal insults are against Saidit Terms of Service. This comment is a TOS violation and has been reported, everyone please also click report.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

For all the good it's going to do now, with all the responses to the reported messages, it has become part of the conversation. It'd just make this thread hard to read without the rule breaking content at this point.

[–]Chipit 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

So people should get to break the rules...as long as they're hateful feminists here to spew personal insults instead of arguments.

Wow, AmericanMuskrat is totally not a paid social media influencer.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I'm just saying it's a lot easier to remove offending content if it's not the middle of a conversation, i.e. don't reply to it. Otherwise it just turns the whole post into swiss cheese.

At least two people were recently temp banned for name calling, there's just no announcement about it.

Wow, AmericanMuskrat is totally not a paid social media influencer.

I wish someone paid me for this.

[–]Chipit 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

So, we should allow banned content as long as it agrees with your far left views. Even if it violates site TOS. Gotcha. Because otherwise it might be inconvenient.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

They used "acting like" which makes it less of an insult. They presented a theory that this behavior is incel-like. I do appreciate your concern for the pyramid though. It ain't easy having subjective rules.