/r/MGTOW banned

submitted by Vulptex from reddit.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]bluetinfoilhat 3 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 4 fun -  (23 children)

They took too long banning it. That subreddit really spread that ideology wide. If only YouTube would start banning similar content. I am not libertarian when it comes to free speech.

[–]Cass 10 insightful - 5 fun10 insightful - 4 fun11 insightful - 5 fun -  (6 children)

Who the fuck cares. If the sad losers want a support group to get them through life let them have it.

[–]jet199 7 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 3 fun -  (4 children)

There's been 3 terrorists directly linked to that sub.

I'm not in favour of banning MGTOW but it is weird they survived while so many other subs with not one single little mass shooter got banned years ago.

[–]JasonCarswell 9 insightful - 4 fun9 insightful - 3 fun10 insightful - 4 fun -  (2 children)

There are folks with issues everywhere. There have been several self-confessed suicidal folks here. Silencing them won't help them. Maybe those 3 "terrorists" could have used more support to prevent it. There is a war on men and whiteness and any threat of independence to the status quo.

[–]Vulptex[S] 7 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

My theory is that we torment people with mental problems because we instinctively want to drive them to suicide if they can't handle it, because it removes them from the gene pool. Especially men, because women inherently matter by virtue of having a uterus while men are only valuable for their achievements. Nature is sick and twisted and downright disgusting.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

"Nature is sick and twisted and downright disgusting."

This is also why you cannot break the cell door, you look at nature in a subjective light. Be more objective, and you will get somewhere.

[–]Vulptex[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Because they don't actually care about terrorism, they care when someone says something they don't like.

[–]bluetinfoilhat 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Because they are not just discussing their life but creating a bizarre anti woman religion.

[–]aniani02 8 insightful - 3 fun8 insightful - 2 fun9 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

Really? Why would you ban some guys who are sharing their experiences with each other? Isn't the main idea is to have a war of ideas and let the best win? If you get to sensor, you're not any better than Mao or marxists. The first amendment is there for a reason.

[–]skeeter 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Casual use of the word "censor" is a class Q crime that is punishable

[–]Yin 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

I am not libertarian when it comes to free speech.

You (your type) are the only ones who should be banned. How do you like that lack of liberty?

[–]Vulptex[S] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Censorship for thee but not for me!

[–]Vulptex[S] 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

Why use this site then?

[–]bluetinfoilhat 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

They were not just expressing free speech but hate. And the reason they got down is because a poster there was planning on mass shooting. That is how toxic that spot is.

[–]Vulptex[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Hate is speech though, as bad as it is. And it's way too subjective to apply fairly.

[–]bluetinfoilhat 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

I disagree. And I find those who don't think it is a big deal tend to be people who are rarely the target of hate speech.

[–]Vulptex[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I'm one of the most despised people on the internet lol.

[–]bluetinfoilhat 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

but not because of your sex, race, sexual orientation.

[–]Vulptex[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Actually being male garners a shit ton of sexism. If you don't act or think an exact certain way no one will take you seriously. And you're inherently viewed as aggressive and uncaring.

[–]Dragonerne 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I am not libertarian when it comes to free speech.

We don't support your free speech either.

[–]FuckMasks 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

You're pro bans? You believe in misinformation?

[–]skeeter 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

fuck mgtow.

video: one night in bangkok - remix

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tBu-ewMRhkA

[–]asterias 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Isn't it strange how angry all those lesbians who were banned from reddit are with r/MGTOW?