you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]LarrySwinger2 6 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 4 fun -  (30 children)

I especially love this quote:

I hope she grows out of being socially conservative. It's a weird belief for trans people to hold.

They actually pride themselves on their black and white thinking.

What do you mean when you talk about nations within nations, by the way? How does it differ from nations living in close proximity of each other, or sharing the same area and government?

[–]bobbobbybob 6 insightful - 7 fun6 insightful - 6 fun7 insightful - 7 fun -  (2 children)

It's a weird belief for trans people to hold.

but believing that your penis is female is normal amirite?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

That's obviously not trans

[–]jet199 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That's quite a common belief among trans women.

[–]jet199 6 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 4 fun -  (25 children)

To be trans you literally have to believe in innate gender roles. Conservative is their natural place. They mostly sit with the left because the left kisses their arses while the right call them out on their shit. That's literally what Contrapoints admitted.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (15 children)

To be trans you literally have to believe in innate gender roles.

Yeah, the only way transgenderism even makes sense is with traditional gender roles; there has to be a foundation upon which our identities can be built, otherwise it's meaningless. Self-identification breaks down the meaning of gender to a mere feeling, thus invalidates the entire concept of transgenderism.

They mostly sit with the left because the left kisses their arses while the right call them out on their shit.

It's a cult, really. So long as you do everything they tell you to, so long as you never stray from the Democratic Party platform: you're treated as a God — but the moment you disagree with them on any issue to any extent: you might as well be Hitler himself!

That's why the left hates me: I'm socially conservative, I'm pro-life, I oppose illegal immigration, I support law and order — there's no room for disagreement. I support universal healthcare, I support a universal basic income, I want to break up big tech — but that's not enough! There's no room for disagreement. The left is a cult.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

Why do you feel you're a girl though? I'm sure as shit not a traditional guy but I have a dick and I never saw as it was up to me if I wanted to be a guy. It just was.

Also having a penis is awesome. Just go camping. The ladies gotta squat and half the time they pee on themselves.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

What does urination have to do what makeup or what clothes you wear?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

What does gender have to do with makeup or what clothes you wear? Nobody bats an eye if I'm out and about with a dude in makeup.

Urination is a big deal for women. They gotta sit, squatting can be messy, and that means reliance on public restrooms, which are generally disgusting even for the men's restrooms but women are dirtier. And women are slow so there's lines.

You may have noticed women in public often watch what they drink so they have to don't piss a lot since it's inconvenient.

[–]Comatoast 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Someone has never seen a pee funnel.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

But then you're carrying around a piece of plastic with piss on it. It's camping, you don't necessarily have any more water than you carried in. And that makes cleaning suck. Dirty dishes is one thing, but a pee funnel?

[–]Comatoast 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

You just keep it in a ziploc and put it in a fanny pack, rinse out the inner part quickly and shake it off. You're not sticking it up your twat, just using it externally to guide the pee. Better than having piss down your leg, as you were talking about.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Well you're wrong, I was thinking of them pissing on their shoes.

😂

[–]Comatoast 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Gotta rock those wide, lower squats. I don't know, we spent a lot of time playing in the woods during my childhood.

[–]bobbobbybob 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

so tell me, are you female? since you've not had surgery, then conservative views say that you are only playing at gender roles, and whilst conservatism says that men should be manly, and women femme, it is also deeply accepting of people who just live their own lives, since being true to yourself and your community is more highly valued than dishonesty.

and pretending that penises are female is dishonest, therefore falls outside traditional conservative values, which are built on hard won truths

[–]SaidOverRed 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Throw out enslaving doctors (I've watched old people wander around socialized medicine as they wait to die because they were refused care) and UBI (welfare queens are NOT good to scale up, even if inflation didn't eat everything else) and you'd fit right in. Disphoria aside.

note: I was going to instead say 'what do you mean I can't start my own practice and charge what I want?' on the taxpayer healthcare but that is a bit further than many think is fair for public programs (beyond medicare/medicaid/disability/obamacare) ... just in case you didn't see single-payer systems being inevitable. I'm terse, but I'm not trying to strawman.

[–]Comatoast 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

If it weren't a constant fight between insurance companies, the middlemen deciding cost factors on what can be approved (who are inevitably in pockets on both sides), pharmaceutical companies and providers then we wouldn't have the issues that we have. Trying to receive treatment in this damns-given-devoid system of providers in the US is a joke, they typically don't want anything to do with a case if it goes beyond a basic infection. Insurance costs are an absolute travesty. When you have people that would rather die than bankrupt their families to get treatment, the system has failed.

I could see socialized medicine working if we didn't have people living into their 80s and 90s being kept alive by a wardrobe full of pharmaceuticals.

[–]SaidOverRed 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Forgive me but I think you're ready to take my radical position: abolish non-catastrophic insurance. Suddenly drug prices are forced to be transparent, no middle men, both providers & consumers get un-pick-pocketed thus costs go DOWN and far fewer people getting bankrupted (remember, the catastrophic insurance will still exist after shed all the wasteful other parts).

No socialized medicine needed. Deregulate and what the competition. Enjoy cheap health service just like we have cheap health products.

[–]Comatoast 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Most people over 30 in the US are going to require more than 3 primary care visits provided in base level catastrophic insurance, and I have an idea that it's why only those under 30 (outside of extenuating financial circumstances) are eligible for many of those plans right now. Until everyone's weight is within a range that doesn't immediately throw them into health issues caused/exacerbated by obesity, we're going to have problems with insurance companies trying to make that money back by spreading the cost out to everyone else. Many Americans require more than a few visits a year and basic preventative care, so would have to pay out of pocket for all of those visits until the high deductible cost is met. This doesn't even factor in psychiatric care, which is usually considered to be specialist care.

One problem with the cost of prescriptions right now is the amount of time that brand name drugs are allowed to be exclusively on the market before generic drugs are allowed to be put out there. Many plans will only cover the cost of generics, so you'll have older and less effective medications available at shittier quality that cause side effects to tie back into the loop of needing more healthcare visits.

I'm not really able to work out what you're explaining to be beneficial or reduce costs, outside of for a low percentage of the population. Maybe I'm misunderstanding something here.

[–]SaidOverRed 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Whoa there. That was a lot at once. 1) any desired, possible product not available to consumers is always held back by government intervention, so thank your closest Democrat. 2) Yes, fat people are going to have to get their act together and having transparent costs is a good motivator.

3) People that know they have scheduled visits should budget for those things. Insurance companies are not budgets: you lose efficiency by doing that since now you are paying someone else to budget for you. If you're lazy (or rich) then it's fine to have someone else do that, but those who need the money should be encouraged to spend their own time and not be forced to pay for an actuarialist employed by an insurance company to do it for them.

4) I am so on board with lower patent/copy right terms it's not even funny. As far as head-meds, very few people need them. Epileptics, those with genetic disorders, etc. Your average person with a shitty life who wants to use Prozac as a crutch should be cared for by their family and church, not a shrink or the government. And yes, they have huge side effects which those shrinks conveniently forget to bring up ... and hey, look at that now the person hooked on their drugs needs them even more! Funny how that works.

5) I'm assuming some economic education there. My point was for all BUT a small portion of the population, not the inverse. the tl;dr is that forcing up front price advertisement allows people to make informed decisions and rewards more efficient competition which reduces costs. Well at least for 99% of the population. Think food prices. Sure maybe 1% of the population does get a bit screwed (gluten free diets are expensive) but everyone else benefits enormously, and even that 1% still can benefit from economy of scale and sector parallels to meet their needs better than in a non-free market. Note that the US healthcare system is NOT free. If you want to haggle over price with a patient and insurance, even beforehand for elective procedures, you will get fined/thrown in jail. This is why prices aren't transparent, and thus, very high.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Wow. That sounds sane. This is so weird.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 4 fun2 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 4 fun -  (8 children)

trans you literally have to believe in innate gender roles

'Trans' is not so easily explained, as it's different for different people, and most trans people are likely 'left', because the 'left' believes in human rights, equality, diversity, choice, sexual differences, underrepresented people, marginalised people, etc., etc.

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

No, the left doesn't believe in these things. The left believes in PERSONAL ENTITLEMENT and uses these things in order to get their way. And because the trans are first and foremost insane, they feel molested by everything and anything, so they side with the left and their power politics.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

However you want to interpret 'personal entitlement', that is also definitely a problem of the Republicans and 1%, who want to support greed, guns, restruction of human rights, mistreatment of others, all for their own personal entitlements

And assuming that all trans people are the same is obviously a non-starter

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Well they're all nuts, so what more do you want? And about personal entitlement: of course it's everywhere, but at least the right has the decency to not stoop so low as to claim something like "I'm not getting my way, therefore I am oppressed, therefore YOU OWE ME EVERYTHING I WANT." Which is essentially what the far left power politics are all about.

Which is why the left is so horribly dangerous: they will claim it's about human rights, equality, diversity, choice, freedom, underrepresented or marginalized people, etc. when in fact it's all about throwing a giant, never-ending tantrum until they get everything they want. And because they are insane, there is simply no pleasing these people, and so they are - unwittingly, I believe - bent on destroying the world until they feel they've made everybody equal.

But that "equality" only happens long after we live in an amplified version of Orwell's 1984, with its boot stamping down on a human face - FOREVER. Will they be satisfied once they're living under such a regime? Doubtful! And yet, that's the direction they're steering the world, under the guidance of the eternally subhuman master parasite, the Jew.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

OK - I see your point about these problems with the left. Indeed, I support Bernie, but I don't agree with him about free education, deletion of all student debt, and other giveaways. Though the US can afford it (and spend less on the military, for example), the political establishment would never approve it. And thus it's a waste of time to propose this kind of legislation. Also, the banks are way too powerful in D.C. But Social Security - that's much more than an 'entitlement'. It's my money, and your money, put there for retirement. Reagan's Admin was the first to take money from Social Security, and the cuts to similar programs developed thereafter. This really pisses off those of us who appreciate what the New Deal has done for the US, as we watch the Republicans dismantle all of it. I'm not sure - perhaps I'm getting off topic. But my main point is that the 99% should be our focus, and I don't see the Republicans - historically - focusing on the 99%. In fact, quite the opposite. Thus we have to work with a corrupt system for political solutions that will start to help the 99%. For example, the $15 minimum wage seems to be agreed by both parties. Strange that Manchin killed that part of the recent bill. But again, I digress....

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

guns

Counter point: guns are really fun.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Indeed - for most of us.

[–]jet199 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

You are just repeating most of what I said in nicer terms.

The left will accept them, the right mostly won't.

Although kids being transitioned happens more in conservative families because they don't want gay kids.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I see.

Although kids being transitioned happens more in conservative families because they don't want gay kids.

I didn't know this. Mind blown.

[–][deleted] 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

They actually pride themselves on their black and white thinking.

It's tribalism. Anyone outside the tribe is a "Fascist".

What do you mean when you talk about nations within nations, by the way?

Basically, it's the idea that there are hierarchies of Nations. For example, Dixie is a Nation within the Anglo-American Nation, which is itself within the Pan-Anglo Nation.