you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]AFutureConcern 8 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

They do want to end "racism".

"Racism" is a term used to attack white people. They view "racism" as a system of power that keeps white people ahead. Anything that equalizes this power structure (even including violence if it would be effective) is "antiracist" and is viewed as good.

Take antiracist scholar Ibram X. Kendi, for example - he says:

One either allows racial inequities to persevere, as a racist, or confronts racial inequities, as an antiracist. There is no in-between safe space of “not racist.” The claim of “not racist” neutrality is a mask for racism.

Basically, Kendi believes that you either discriminate against white people to "confront racial inequities" (in which case you are antiracist), or you don't, making you a racist. He doesn't care about being fair, or even equality of opportunity, but equality of outcome. He won't stop discriminating against white people until the relative power of the races is equalized.

[–]NiceDickBro 8 insightful - 6 fun8 insightful - 5 fun9 insightful - 6 fun -  (1 child)

I feel like I lost brain cells reading that.

[–]IridescentAnaconda 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I feel like I lost brain cells reading that.

Try reading a document I came across recently, "Equitable Decisionmaking". Careful, you might end up like Joe Biden.