you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]BreedersAreScum 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Putting the prefix "neo" before something is a scare tactic.

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

It most certainly is not. Marxism is about the idea that the socioeconomic life of nations and the world can be looked at through the lens of CLASS conflict: very rich vs upper vs middle vs lower. Neo-Marxism uses a similar template, but it's "my group" vs "the other groups" such as "transgenders VS cis genders", "LGBTQ+ vs straights", "liberals vs conservatives", "atheists vs religious", and so on. It is a new twist on the Marxist idea and truly deserves its NEO-Marxist moniker.

[–]BreedersAreScum 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Marx was just another oppressor class piece of shit by his own standards.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You oversimplify things greatly. Marx was either "wrong" or, my opinion, an evil, manipulative liar. And undoubtedly a thoroughly hateful individual. He hated the rich much more than he ever cared for the "working class". As such, he certainly was a destroyer, but not exactly an oppressor. I just don't see where that angle might be true.