you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]SteveTafe 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Reject all forms of affirmative action, each person is responsible for themselves, we are not the worlds caretakers

[–]HeyImSancho 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

wise words of an individual; now be ready to be targeted as an awake, and aware individual; as the greatest threat to the authoritarian state, and controlling cabal is that very thing.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (3 children)

The authoritarian state is the renegade cuntservative faction that seeks division in order to control society.

Nice try, liberalism will always equal freedom. Cuntservative = freedumb!

[–]HeyImSancho 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Such a provocative something.... You turn this into a left, right paradigm; totally rooting for your 'home-team'. You say 'liberalism=freedom'. Now, in a classical sense, liberals should be 'okay' with what anyone does, in any which way; likewise conservatives in a classic way, mind their own business as others do what they want.

Yet, both modern interpretations are different wardrobes of the same authoritarianism. However, I would read your comment in support of what I would consider the bat shit crazy left today, but I'm willing to bite. Please explain to me what modern liberalism does to equal 'freedom'?

What do you consider freedom?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Hmm... good question. Freedom?

The core of human psychology will always be conservative/protectionist in a scarce chaotic environment, so as the years go by and institutions rot; the center will seek to protect itself against the necessary changes from newer dynamics- such is the nature of the bureaucratic administrative processes (human error and biases count for a huge chunk of it). The system basically becomes its own enemy over time because the comfort and convenience of old age is the stubborn, stale belief of a smaller system with pre-set pieces of cogs operating under bygone laws.

Liberalism on the other hand, attempts to throw a wrench into that system due to its flexibility or variability. It is not perfect, and probably bat-shit. Also it is doomed to failure in very many forms, but when you get the right blend of liberal/conservative amalgamations capable of seeing the larger scientific picture with a manuever towards the center; then it hits closer to reality as to what the future truly is meant to be, and the protectionist conservative barriers unravel so the real center could emerge.

Unfortunately, die hard conservatism would not allow for this flexibility or anything new to emerge. Just as ultra-fanatic liberalism may not allow proper structure; but if you wanted to fight the idiocy of ultra instinctual conservatism then throw a hard left against a hard right. Crush both! And let the system figure it out once again. Now is that bat-shit enough for ya?

Down with the orange messiah!

[–]HeyImSancho 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Unfortunately, die hard conservatism would not allow for this flexibility or anything new to emerge. Just as ultra-fanatic liberalism may not allow proper structure; but if you wanted to fight the idiocy of ultra instinctual conservatism then throw a hard left against a hard right. Crush both! And let the system figure it out once again. Now is that bat-shit enough for ya?

Down with the orange messiah!

I can actually follow much of your thinking, and can agree on a lot of it. My freedom is 'self determination'. Our current world, past, and present, hates self determination on the whole. , All regualtions are created to allow the next mullet, the next idiot, the next cog, the next goy, the next xyz, petty bureaucratic power over the next person; in reality eliminating freedom which is self determination.

What allows, or affords people to have self determination are 'equalizers'. These stop tyrants, and psychopaths from domineering, subjugating, and ultimately seeking dominion over the next sentient(my thought) being. I do envision a world where there would be no restriction on personal defense, and arms. To further that thought, what I envision as the ultimate society, is one in which everyone can be the real freak, or not, that they were always meant to be. People being armed, and having self determination would naturally create checks, and balances; aka RESPECT. Universal Respect, if you, or I, or the next mullet realize that we cannot control others, and others can, and are able to defend themselves, then respect would rule. Sure at any given transition, fear would overcome people, but think about it, really. The concept isn't foreign.

The world we currently live in, 'self protection', or 'self defense', is liberally allowed for the servants of empire: police, soldiers, judges, district attorneys, and just about every other 'agent of control' is allowed to kill subordinate human beings(regular folks), should they feel threatened.. It's really quite the contradiction to a world of self-determination=freedom..... The world we live in, with the ignorance of the people, allows tyrants to dictates to us all scope of narrative, or topic.... what can be discussed, and what's taboo, and in all ways an enforcer backed up by real force to keep us in within the boundaries.

A glaring example of how the narratives, and topics are controlled, would be Hitler, and WW2. Take the entire war at face value, Hitler was a monster, right? To stop him, at the time, America entered the war, we are what crushed Germany. Yet, we were also collectively punished, the results of WW2 still have lasting implications across many fronts in America, and the world as whole.

Juxtaposed, the European royalty are still living parasites on the respective people they supposedly 'reside over'. Their family history across many countries is intertwined; for the most part one family, with differing branches controlling all of Europe, and a lot of the world. Their story is the same as all modern 'royal' lineages, that of continual genocidal tyrants, and psychopaths; literally stealing their way to the top in history... AND WE DO NOTHING, people gladly allow the ruse to continue,"My Queen", "My King", "My Lord", "My Baron", and the list goes fucking on. We could also bring up the "Catholic Church", and the inquisition, and the fact we allow that institution to remain. Why not bring up the Roman Empire, who really were the ones who spurred massive genocide across the globe, but we don't. My point is we're given blinders, and most folks eagerly drink the cool-aid.

Imo, not only does the entire world as it stands today, hate freedom=self determination, most eagerly hand their rights to self determination over to 'royal-shithead-control'. Even having faith that anyone will save you, I, or the next mullet is giving our self determination over to someone else; almost always because it's easier than facing our own minds, and solving our own problems(hello religi-tards). Be the change you want for yourself without domineering others in all regards; this is respect of oneself, and that of others; freedom.

As far as the orange messiah, he's an actor on the world stage of demonstration, just like all of the fuckers that we give our freedom to over, and over again.