The Reddit Admins are now removing comments on /r/conspiracy that question "official" historical events

submitted by [deleted] from reddit.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Do you think they used gas chambers?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

No, not for people. Maybe there's a couple of minor exceptions like that gas chamber truck.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

H.. o.. a... +...

;-)

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Yeah maybe I'm just being a pedantic dick. It's like the climate change debate... calling it a "hoax" doesn't specifically address any facts or help to drive the conversation forward. It's even false to a degree, because there really is more C02 right now and different weather than in centuries past. So the climate changing is not a hoax. Instead you could say there's no evidence that man is responsible for climate change.

Similarly, the revisionists are only revising 2 or 3 specific facts about the Holocaust, they're not saying there's no such event exists.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

There was no firey destruction, which is really the defining requirement.

I agree that it's a historical event.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

There was no firey destruction

They fixed that part for the book version! Babies being burned alive in this one: https://www.amazon.com/Night-Elie-Wiesel/dp/0374500010/