Unlock Your Math Potential with Math Assignment Help MathsAssignmentHelp.com, our experienced tutors will guide you through complex problems, ensuring you grasp every concept with ease. by MathHwHelp in Mathematics

[–]MathHwHelp[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Our experienced tutors will guide you through complex problems, ensuring you grasp every concept with ease. From algebra to calculus, we've got you covered! 💡 Embrace stress-free learning and excel in your academic journey with personalized support. 🚀 Don't let math be a hurdle; let it be your stepping stone towards success! Visit MathsAssignmentHelp.com now and unlock your true math potential with our reliable assistance. #MathAssignmentHelp #AcademicSupport #MathGenius

Russell's Paradox - a simple explanation of a profound problem (28:28) ~ Jeffrey Kaplan by JasonCarswell in Mathematics

[–]Oyveygoyim 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

So be it

Russell's Paradox - a simple explanation of a profound problem (28:28) ~ Jeffrey Kaplan by JasonCarswell in Mathematics

[–]BISH 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

"This sentence is false"

What's the answer? Is it true or false?

It's a statement. The question creates paradoxical conditions that aren't inherent to the stand-alone statement.

The entire paradox is predicated on arbitrary rules that are assigned to the set.

"Bad things are good."

Is this a true/false statement?
Who cares. It's irrelevant, without a real world context.

These sets are designed to factor out real world issues, so the ruling class (Bertrand Russell, etc.) can pretend they're objective, and that their decisions are logically justifiable.

Heavy emphasis on in-group and out-group classification. Consistent with a culture of class-oriented scumbags.

Russell's Paradox - a simple explanation of a profound problem (28:28) ~ Jeffrey Kaplan by JasonCarswell in Mathematics

[–]Dragonerne 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

"This sentence is false"

What's the answer? Is it true or false?

Russell's Paradox - a simple explanation of a profound problem (28:28) ~ Jeffrey Kaplan by JasonCarswell in Mathematics

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Correct, thats not a paradox at all, ''A' equals 'not A'' evaluates to false

Russell's Paradox - a simple explanation of a profound problem (28:28) ~ Jeffrey Kaplan by JasonCarswell in Mathematics

[–]BISH 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Bertrand Russell was a piece of shit eugenicist.

He forced underage children to have sex with each other, to research a better way of undermining monogamous relationships. He was given a special charter to experiment on children in the US.

Russell's Paradox - a simple explanation of a profound problem (28:28) ~ Jeffrey Kaplan by JasonCarswell in Mathematics

[–]BISH 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The paradox is, "Can a thing be something, that it isn't?"

Answer: No.

Russell's Paradox - a simple explanation of a profound problem (28:28) ~ Jeffrey Kaplan by JasonCarswell in Mathematics

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

That's not much of a deal.

Russell's Paradox - a simple explanation of a profound problem (28:28) ~ Jeffrey Kaplan by JasonCarswell in Mathematics

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

No. That was one I heard as a kid. Your recollection is accurate.

Not sure why the other guy went crazy when learning of the paradox. I suspect he was on the edge anyway.

Russell's Paradox - a simple explanation of a profound problem (28:28) ~ Jeffrey Kaplan by JasonCarswell in Mathematics

[–]Oyveygoyim 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

If you stop posting your shitty jew interviews in multiple subs then you have a deal!

Russell's Paradox - a simple explanation of a profound problem (28:28) ~ Jeffrey Kaplan by JasonCarswell in Mathematics

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Lol, was that his paradox? I know he was involved in the work on this after Godel, but I didn't watch the video due to my strict policy on only reading. Godel's was essentially 'this sentence is lie'

Russell's Paradox - a simple explanation of a profound problem (28:28) ~ Jeffrey Kaplan by JasonCarswell in Mathematics

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Ignore me and remain as ignorant as you like.

Russell's Paradox - a simple explanation of a profound problem (28:28) ~ Jeffrey Kaplan by JasonCarswell in Mathematics

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Why did the monkey fall out of the tree?
Because it was dead.
Why did the monkey die?
Because it fell out of a tree.

Russell's Paradox - a simple explanation of a profound problem (28:28) ~ Jeffrey Kaplan by JasonCarswell in Mathematics

[–]Oyveygoyim 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Ah more jew videos from JasonJEWSwell

Russell's Paradox - a simple explanation of a profound problem (28:28) ~ Jeffrey Kaplan by JasonCarswell in Mathematics

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

This is a profound problem, some more background on it because it goes further back than Bertrand Russell

This was actually just a different application of what Godel had just proved in his Incompleteness Theorem, as was Turing's halting problem. Even then, Godel just created a mathematical description logically equivalent to the Pre-Socratic philosopher Gorgias' theory of non-existence circa 400's BCE that nobody (perhaps not even Godel) realized the mathematical significance of

When Descartes Challenged Fermat (and Lost) by Alan_Crowe in Mathematics

[–]Alan_Crowe[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This video is long, forty-seven minutes, but totally worth it. There is some history. The historical mathematics is given in full, and you can see how Fermat kinda, nearly, maybe invented calculus before Newton and Leibniz. What adds to the fun is that the video fully describes Descartes approach first. It is ingenious and pretty cool, which sets the stage for the final showdown...

How to write an Eulerian fluid simulator with 200 lines of code. by Alan_Crowe in Mathematics

[–]Alan_Crowe[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The video starts by explaining that Eulerian contrasts with Lagrangian.

Eulerian is when you have a grid, with velocity values at grid points. Then it gets into using a staggered grid, with velocity values at the midpoint of each cell wall.

Lagrangian is when you have particles, lots of particles, and interaction between them, and this video isn't about that.

The video plunges into the details. I'm guessing that it is only first order accurate, which keeps things simple. And the language is JavaScript which is widely available.

Kissing numbers: Surprises in Dimension Four by [deleted] in Mathematics

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Finally. Someone with not only the ability to think for himself, but actually doing it.

I got a diploma, a bachelor in another discipline, and I am working on a master's thesis.

But since my favorite interests have been used continuously against me in pathetic tries to gaslight me into bullshit I just "can't" buy, so to say,

I won't tell you how deep my friendship with Tinkerbell actually is this easily.

Kissing numbers: Surprises in Dimension Four by [deleted] in Mathematics

[–]Alan_Crowe 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

An interesting article. And a little frustrating. The upper bounds are hard. How do we know that you cannot fit 25 balls around a ball in 4 dimensional space? That is the tricky side of the proof, best left to professional mathematicians. How do we know that you can fit 24 balls around a ball in 4 dimensional space? Well, the article could give locations for the centers of the balls and readers could use Pythagoras' theorem to check the distances.

In two dimensions, the center ball is at the origin, (0,0) and the six surrounding balls are at (1,0), (1/2, √3/2), (-1/2, √3/2), (1/2, -√3/2), (-1/2, √3/2). Since it is past my bed time, I'm not going to check that I've got that right.

The article says how to do it in 3D dimensions: use an icosahedron. That doesn't sound right, an icosahedron has twenty faces. Perhaps they mean dodecahedron, the one with twelve faces? No, they were right with icosahedron, because it has twelve corners, top, bottom and two rings of five. I could come up with the coordinates in three or four hours :-)

But four dimensions? They give a drawing of a four cell in the article. But it is a two dimensional drawing of a four dimensional shape, so just the four dimensional shape projected to create an incomprehensible mess of lines.

Wait, I think https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/24-cell gives the game away

8 vertices obtained by permuting the integer coordinates:

(±1, 0, 0, 0)

and 16 vertices with half-integer coordinates of the form:

(±1/2, ±1/2, ±1/2, ±1/2)

I'll have to think about that tomorrow.

Without calculus, can we prove sin x = x - x³/3! + x⁵/5! -...? by Alan_Crowe in Mathematics

[–]AXXA 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Thanks for posting this video. Looking at it geometrically makes it easier for me to understand.

Without calculus, can we prove sin x = x - x³/3! + x⁵/5! -...? by Alan_Crowe in Mathematics

[–]Alan_Crowe[S] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

This video does amazing things with involutes, working in an "applied maths"/"19th Century non-rigorous style".

Professor Sir Timothy Gowers' 2012 lecture: Hilbert's Dream by Alan_Crowe in Mathematics

[–]Alan_Crowe[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The talk starts with David Hilbert's notion of mechanising mathematics. After briefly reviewing why this is a lost cause, Tim turns to a much weaker notion of "mechanisation". Can we write computer programs that have "flashes" of genius? Tim gives some nice examples of minor flashes of genius that might actually be discoverable by systematic methods. And he spills the beans on how mathematicians hide their tracks to make their talents appear more mysterious than they really are.

First non-abelian Group you know ? by [deleted] in Mathematics

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Its D8, For all my algebraic friends.

Proof that 1 = 2. by Brewdabier in Mathematics

[–]Brewdabier[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

So I should believe some random poster over a math professor, yeah and I turn lead into gold. Now why don't you try this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GoixtkJU6BI

Proof that 1 = 2. by Brewdabier in Mathematics

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You realize who is the boss or rather your end-boss in this sub? I'll let this one slide because you BOTH don't understand which cardinal mistake he made and I like the laughs. Hint: if you follow through in his kind of proving every number equals zero. In contrast to you two brain dead idiots I can prove that.

Proof that 1 = 2. by Brewdabier in Mathematics

[–]Brewdabier[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

in Ordnung

Proof that 1 = 2. by Brewdabier in Mathematics

[–]Optimus85 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Mathematisch neuer Spreche.

Sage Mathematical Software System by [deleted] in Mathematics

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

When i studied Maple was kind of a thing. But Maple is closed-source and therefore costs.

So i recommend Sage for anyone doing his first steps with a C(omputer) A(lgebra) S(ystem) : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_algebra_system

Math Inspector - A Visual Programming Environment for Scientific Computing by zyxzevn in Mathematics

[–]zyxzevn[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

According to the creator, it is meant as an open-source replacement for Mathematica.