"Truther Top 20 Jewish Self-Victimization Examples" on InfoGalactic - join to contribute

submitted by JasonCarswell from infogalactic.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (19 children)

Holy shit. Good catch. I just copy pasted from a list here on Said It a few weeks back. I regret not linking back to source. This is more than embarrassing.

This whole list is not really my thing. I have reasons to post it here though. And I had a reason to copy-paste it - it was an easy list. This should teach me to be so lazy in the future.

Ya, looking at it, 60k seems like too many. They did get a Hebrew text message warning though. That's well documented.

I've cut #11 entirely as I really don't give a crap about this issue, much less want to research it.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (18 children)

Yeah the real number is like 4k. I did see an interesting summary where 100 to 130 Jews were expected to die at WTC, but only 1 did. I didn't take the time to verify it but it was interesting. I think they were guessing at who was Jewish by last names on the victim list.

[–]MartinTimothy 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (17 children)

The under 3000 dead line is one of the mainstay falsehoods of the entire conspiracy, estimates of 50,000 dead in New York were made at 2:48 PM on the afternoon of the same day.

NIST Engineer Sunder said "on 911 there were between 8,500 & 9,000 occupants in each building," ABC News Anchor Peter Jennings while the drama was still unfolding said, "the normal total of workers at the WTC Towers was around eighty thousand."

Sunder's total of between seventeen and eighteen thousand in the Towers makes some sixty two thousand or so absent using Peter Jennings' figures.

Evidence of Mossad Treachery at the WTC, by Ed Toner .. "nearly 500 foreign nationals from over 80 different nations were killed in the World Trade Center, as a center of world trade and finance this is not surprising.

It is known many Israelis work in the field of international trade and finance, the laws of probability dictate there should have been a considerable number of Israelis dead.

Alon Pinkas Israel’s Consul General in New York confirmed one Israeli dead in each of the planes that crashed into the towers, and another who had been at the WTC on business.

Lt Richard Smiouskas FDNY, 27 November 2001 .. "after the North Tower air strike an engineer got me onto the roof of WTC 2 the South Tower, I saw people in the windows [of the North Tower] they weren't jumping they were being forced out."

The NYPD refused to attempt helicopter rescues for those trapped in the burning towers, while the official death toll of some under three thousand is to fit the four hundred dead Jews whose names appear on the official list.

Who were the ones who stayed and threw others from windows according to Smiouskas' testimony, who were sold out when NYPD choppers never showed up .. the FDNY identified "about 1500 jumpers."

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (16 children)

So you're claiming 3000 dead is a lie to make 400 dead Jews make sense? Geeze I've got to look into this more.

Also it's hard to follow your comments

When you quote your own words like this

If that's what's happening.

[–]Jesus 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Ummmm, look https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Dwjg0PXUcAAIo0U?format=jpg&name=medium

Back in 2001 we may not have recognized the absurdity of this aspect of the story, but we sure should see it now.

The 9/11 narrative requires an explanation for thousands of people remaining in the buildings 60-90 minutes after the supposed planes crashed, so they gave us this. The entire story was likely made up to account for the amount of deaths.

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Thanks for that verfication.

I don't see how this would have to be made up to account for the number of deaths.

[–]Jesus 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I just do not believe people were told after running out of a burning building that they need to run back upstairs. I have yet to find eye-witness accounts of who ordered this or if it was even a real order. But yet, the corporate media broadcasted this everywhere. Why?

[–]MartinTimothy 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Anger of Survivors Told to Stay Inside Blazing Towers .. Workers Fleeing in Panic Were Sent Back Into Inferno. Special Report, Terrorism in the US by Ed Vulliamy, New York, Monday Sept. 17, 2001 01.31 AEST. Link. Mirror.

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Excellent question.

Ask Ryan Dawson : https://discordapp.com/channels/428399448993824768/428399448993824770

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

I don't buy anything MartinTimothy says/copy-pastes.

He's a shitposter. Look at his overview and go back a few pages... /user/MartinTimothy

I've heard the official death toll is actually inflated. This is pure echoing of stuff, perhaps nonsense I've heard but haven't looked into. The DNA that they got only identified half of the alleged victims, leaving the other half as missing but presumed dead - if they ever even existed. I don't know if I'm just repeating crap I heard or if this is legit.

Some claim they wanted maximum body count for maximum emotional impact. This makes sense, especially with the reports of telling people nothing to flee, etc.

Personally I think they should count all the first responders who died of cancer. That's a significant number.

[–]wizzwizz4 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

That's a significant number.

Is that data available? If so, I'd like to see it. If not, how do you know?

(Just healthy scepticism; I'm not even bothering to critique MartinTimothy at the moment because I'm tired of that.)

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

https://duckduckgo.com/?q=9%2F11+first+responders+death+count

I picked one from Aug. 2017:

https://www.cnn.com/2017/08/17/health/9-11-cancer-first-responders-father-son/index.html

Counting the 9/11 cancers

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's World Trade Center Health Program provides medical monitoring and treatment for emergency responders, workers and volunteers who helped in rescue and recovery after the 9/11 attacks.

The program also provides health evaluations and treatment for people who were in the disaster area. Research suggests that some cancers may be tied to exposures from the 9/11 attacks, according to the World Trade Center Health Program.

The CDC said in an emailed statement that as of June 30, 7,139 people enrolled in the program were certified with at least one type of cancer covered by the program.

Among those, 6,028 were responders. The top certified cancers among responders included non-melanoma skin, prostate, melanoma, lymphoma and thyroid.

[–]wizzwizz4 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

I don't trust CNN, but that's high publicity. I'll have to follow that up.

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Look at the link above CNN.

[–]wizzwizz4 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Now I see why you hypothesised Anthrax. Though iirc that doesn't cause cancer.

I'd expect it to be from exposure to heavy smoke, perhaps burning asbestos – that sort of thing. In which case the primary cancer would be lung cancer. I don't know if that's the case, though.

[–]wizzwizz4 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

TL;DR: Despite wanting to say bad things about what MartinTimothy is saying, it's written in such a confusing manner that I can't follow a coherent thought to critique.

MartinTimothy says stuff that makes no sense in order to cause some people to draw some conclusions and other people to not be able to critique what he's saying. I'm assuming that "he" is a "he", but honestly I'm not even sure whether there's a human at all behind that username.

I mean, this might be a post by a human, but certainly some of that is copied and pasted from other similarly-behaving accounts' posts. Be wary.

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

MartinTimothy = Russian bot.

Disappointing results when you put it in here: https://www.anagrammer.com/anagrammer/

[–]wizzwizz4 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Not necessarily Russian. We mustn't jump to conclusions about such things!

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Russian bot from East Timor?