you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Foidblaster9000 6 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 4 fun -  (3 children)

The way I took her comment was looking at it like how something with a solid point is presented versus how it ends up in practice when subverted towards chaos

[–]Node 5 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 4 fun -  (2 children)

Many groups in real life have some degree of a non-qualifying fringe. I remember when theredpill started on reddit, it was practical and rational. Then around 5000 subscribers it became known as "the worst sub on reddit", and retarded angry assholes started flooding in, due to the false promotion.

IMO, the non-qualified have no effect on the ideas or philosophies they claim (or just imply) they represent. Even if 99% of claimers are fakes, that doesn't give them any authority to represent something they don't.

u/Melodic_Programmer

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (1 child)

Your points are fair.

[–]Node 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Thanks. I didn't start off very well with my first reply.