Leftist doublespeak translator

submitted by [deleted] from (scontent-gru2-1.xx.fbcdn.net)

all 22 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]magnora7 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

This post: complains about strawman attacks, while making a strawman attack

[–]sawboss 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

It does, but it's funny.

[–]magnora7 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

Eh I guess if you find tired republican stereotypes of democrats to be funny :P

[–]sawboss 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Maybe sometimes.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

while making a strawman attack

Does not make sense. When right argument, the left uses fallacy as these

[–]magnora7 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

What? You talk about not making sense, then don't even use complete sentences or correct grammar, and you expect me to pick up the pieces of your sentence fragments? lol

[–]happysmash27 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

Which leftists? Most socialist types tend to oppose gun control in my experience.

[–]sawboss 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Really? Please go on.

[–]happysmash27 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Yes. See, for example, the Socialist Rifle Association. Firearms can be used by minorities to protect themselves from others, and can also be used to oppose a forced-capitalist government that forces people to participate in the big machine socialists call "capitalism" via many laws that require one to work for the owner class to make money.

[–]sawboss 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Are you a member and may I ask more questions?

[–]happysmash27 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

At the moment, I am not a member, but I will answer any questions if I can.

[–]sawboss 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

https://files.catbox.moe/plulml.png

Does these items effectively exclude white people?

[–]happysmash27 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Probably not, unless they are racist themselves and think that all white people are racist, which I doubt is the case.

[–]sawboss 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

i wish i could assume that's not the case. this is interesting, maybe i'll come back to it tomorrow. thanks.

[–]HopeThatHalps 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

smash capitalism, fight for the working class

What this actually means is reject the primacy of ownership.

assault weapon

Overpowered gun, much higher odds of lethality.

Your fair share

I never hear "leftists" actually say this.

I support gun control

Fuck it, lets allow people to own fully autonomous, computer controlled turrets, while we're at it. You can even shoot people from your smart phone while laying in bed.

That's hate speech

Using racial epithets actually is hate speech.

Nazi! Bigot!

see above

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Stop talk shit, please

[–]Troll 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Here's an easy heuristic: if it comes out of a leftists mouth, it's not true.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

nope rw and capitalism are propaganda from the rich to divide and conquer you, and 99% of dems aren't really lw and are for neoliberalism, which is just unfettered capitalism.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

capitalism are propaganda from the rich to divide and conquer you

The fundamental right on libertarianism is the private property and the NAP. So they won't "conquer" anyone...

[–]magnora7 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

What about when one human tries to own another? Nothing would stop that in your libertarian world?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Do you know the meaning of the word "voluntary"?

[–]magnora7 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The fundamental right on libertarianism is the private property and the NAP. So they won't "conquer" anyone...

Nowhere do I see the word voluntary.