This post is locked. You won't be able to comment.

all 35 comments

[–][deleted] 18 insightful - 1 fun18 insightful - 0 fun19 insightful - 1 fun -  (14 children)

I'm guessing my comment is one of the reasons you made this post: https://saidit.net/s/Lesbians/comments/6bpt/sucks_to_be_a_lesbian_sometimes/oiyz?context=3

children don't have sex drives. I'm not making that up because I'm a homophobic straight person. It just is how it is. So, if a child experiences a "crush" on someone/something it's not because they want to have sex with it. Like I said kids get crushes on animals cartoon characters. I don't think that indicates their sexuality

To me, you are confusing sexual attraction with any kind of attraction. Attraction to others can come in the form of admiration, respect, appreciation etc. You can be attracted to a persons qualities without wanting to have sex with them just saying.

You act like this is exclusive to homosexuals. Straight kids are the same way. When I was a kid my best friend and I had "crushes" on each other and wanted to get married and live in a cottage in the countryside and pick berries. Well she's straight. Her childhood "crush" on me didn't indicate anything.

But more importantly, what does it matter? If a girl who had a crush on a boy grows up to be a woman who only wants to be with women she will be a lesbian to the whole world regardless of what we think of her childhood crush.

But if the problem you have is with a woman who had a crush on a boy as a child calling herself a lesbian then think of it this way: Instead of calling herself a lesbian, she tells people who ask her sexuality that she is only interested in women. They are going to see her as a lesbian anyway 🤷

[–][deleted] 12 insightful - 3 fun12 insightful - 2 fun13 insightful - 3 fun -  (7 children)

I recall being “fascinated” by women. It was not sexual but it was like a sort of fixation. Conducting forensics to determine lesbianism is a snooze and I’m also getting a little sick of seeing it over and over.

[–][deleted]  (6 children)

[deleted]

    [–][deleted] 10 insightful - 4 fun10 insightful - 3 fun11 insightful - 4 fun -  (5 children)

    Your entire post

    [–][deleted]  (4 children)

    [deleted]

      [–][deleted] 5 insightful - 14 fun5 insightful - 13 fun6 insightful - 14 fun -  (2 children)

      I’ve awarded you an Honourary Degree in Forensic Lesbian Psychology. Go forth and cleanse the world of fakers, one toddler at a time.

      [–][deleted]  (1 child)

      [deleted]

        [–][deleted] 3 insightful - 6 fun3 insightful - 5 fun4 insightful - 6 fun -  (0 children)

        You can always count on me, boss

        [–][deleted]  (4 children)

        [deleted]

          [–][deleted] 15 insightful - 1 fun15 insightful - 0 fun16 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

          ok instead of asking us questions why not tell us why you think that childhood crushes could possibly be the most honest representation of their sexuality? Or why you think children have the ability to have crushes in the same way as adult? Or why you think scientists are lying about children not having libidos because they are homophobic straight people?

          I know you didnt mention sexual attraction but you think all attraction is sexual attraction so I was pointing out that that is not the case.

          I'd like to see you explain your beliefs more. Lets see if theres any factual evidence or truth to them.

          [–][deleted]  (2 children)

          [deleted]

            [–][deleted] 16 insightful - 8 fun16 insightful - 7 fun17 insightful - 8 fun -  (1 child)

            You're the one projecting. You tell me I can't handle someone potential disagreeing with me but you're the one who cried about being gaslit after I replied to your comment with a very reasonable response on that previous post.

            [–]Gearbeta 17 insightful - 1 fun17 insightful - 0 fun18 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

            I have to disagree with this: " Aren't children's attraction the most honest representation of their sexuality before they become older and have homophobic rhetoric instilled in them?"

            Because I can't agree that children's attraction is an honest representation of their sexuality. Many people have no sexual attraction to anyone at all before puberty and almost none of them go on to be asexual as adults. As for children who do have crushes, I would question whether ANY crush, straight or gay was real, prepuberty. Teens most certainly have the ability to have crushes and legitimate relationships etc so I would say if you are crushing on men/boys as a teen then you are, at least a little bisexual.

            [–]les4les 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

            Yeah I think that children are super susceptible to thinking things are crushes when they're not. When I was 6-8 if I had strong feelings in some way about a boy I just figured it was the mythical "crush" but looking back on that, I was mostly jealous of them

            Like how attuned to desire and personal relationships are little children supposed to be, when I was six I thought the definition of marriage was owning a house together

            [–][deleted] 13 insightful - 3 fun13 insightful - 2 fun14 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

            Kids look fairly similar, despite sexes, when they haven’t gone through puberty so i think it’s digging pretty deep for anyone to imagine kids pre-pubescent crushes on other kids their own age as a qualifier for “not lesbian,” if that is what people are insisting. All the prettiest boys in grade school looked much different after puberty, and the girls just kept looking cuter and cuter to my lesbian eyes. Fighting about this stuff is a bit of a waste of energy. Plenty of women say they are lesbians from the ages of like 15-30 and then suddenly come out as bisexual, they are the most disappointing in my eyes. How far back do we need to go to prove lesbianism? Lol

            [–][deleted] 9 insightful - 2 fun9 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

            No one shut you down. I even asked you to explain your views more and you told me to leave you alone.

            [–][deleted] 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

            the silly crushes i had when i was 7 were not sexual in nature & i can say with confidence i have not & will never be attracted to men, but if y'all think that makes me straight anyway then adios. :)

            edit: just saw your edit, i'm not trying to guilt trip you i promise!! i don't think i'm anywhere near that important lol. just sayin farewell.

            [–][deleted]  (3 children)

            [deleted]

              [–][deleted] 15 insightful - 3 fun15 insightful - 2 fun16 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

              Are the crushes lesbians had on girls when we were 7 also silly?

              Yes. Childhood crushes are not deep. I don't know why you think they are the epitome of sexual attraction.

              [–]bastetkat 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

              Speak for yourself.

              [–][deleted] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

              yeah i would say so. i mean it's not s/bisexuals either so whichever you think i am, makes no difference to me lol.

              edit: i'm really not trying to do an argument here, i said what i wanted to say & i genuinely wish all of you the best. <3

              [–]knownasness 7 insightful - 4 fun7 insightful - 3 fun8 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

              i have no opinion on this topic, i just want to reiterate that bisexual lesbians aren't a thing.

              [–]piylot 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

              So which is it?

              Different people have different thoughts on it, that's why there's no consistent stance. We're not a hive mind and shouldn't be. What do you think?

              [–][deleted]  (5 children)

              [deleted]

                [–]Innisfree 16 insightful - 2 fun16 insightful - 1 fun17 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

                And good on you for giving us all a master class on how to come across as patronising and hostile. 10/10

                [–][deleted]  (2 children)

                [deleted]

                  [–]les4les 8 insightful - 7 fun8 insightful - 6 fun9 insightful - 7 fun -  (1 child)

                  "No you" is as always the pinnacle of internet discourse

                  [–][deleted] 3 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

                  Looooooooooooooooollll

                  [–]piylot 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

                  Thank you

                  [–]Destresse 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

                  This was still a controversial topic in psychology circles a few years ago actually. Do children get crushes? Do they have a libido?

                  I can only speak for myself but I did, yeah. It was a very immature libido, meaning I wasn't interested in doing anything. But I was interested. In my own body, and adult women's bodies. Not at all in men's. One day I saw my dad naked and my brain had a moment of disturbed stuttering like.... what the hell is that, is he malformed? lol. I didn't react the same way with my mom. I would always try to catch her naked, and I know, I know, that's disturbing to think about as an adult lol. But there weren't any weird intentions behind it, just... indefinable curiosity. I asked her lots of questions.

                  I didn't think anything of it. Girls had crushes on boys and that was that, so I called whatever I wanted a crush, as long as it was about a boy. I didn't really get any crushes as a child, I think...? Just, uh, a developing libido focused on women only. I think it's very rare for people to remember their "sexual" feelings when they were kids. I remember waaay too much about my childhood. So maybe everyone focuses on admiration/affection when talking about childhood crushes? That would indeed not mean much about their sexual orientation. But affection can be guided by interest/curiosity created by the libido, so I think that'd explain why some crushes are considered significant, while others aren't.

                  That's my theory at least 😅

                  [–]carrotcake 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

                  I think that's a complicated thing that's blurred mainly by semantics, but also by our memories and experiences as a child. Firstly because our definitions of what a "crush" can change depending on how well we know about our sexual desires. For example, I do not believe that homosexual biromantic people exist. I think that they are gay people that are confusing a strong admiration for a crush. Or a bisexual that is in denial about their sexual attraction. They can call it a non sexual crush how much they want, but the way I see it, it isn't. It's just admiration if you are a sexual person that doesn't have sexual attraction to this person's sex. When we are children, since we're told so many times that when we like a boy it means we like him romantically, we can assume that we have a crush without really having them. In the same way a biromantic homosexual woman does, we are calling a feeling of admiration a crush. As kids we don't really dig the meaning of words so that's easier to do. We aren't really aware of our sexual feelings too so that makes it even easier. We do not know, as children, that romantic feelings are basically the mixture of sexual feelings to admiration. So we can call a crush what it isn't.

                  What we define crushes can be moulded by our experiences as well. For example, I never had crushes in boys untill a female friend tell me "oh you must like this guy, you seem totally into him". So I would then say to myself "oh I like this boy then", but never actually have sexual feelings for him. I had, on the other hand, sexual feelings for my girl friends. Of course, it was as sexual as a kid can go, but it was sexual. I found them incredibly beautiful and when they touched me I felt things. I felt sexual attraction for female bodies on TV and so on too. Never felt it for a male body. But I never would say I had a crush for a girl because the way I understood this word would mean "admiration for a boy". I know that my sexual attraction was developed really early in life and I was aware of the existence of sex and masturbation and I could get wet as a child. Not all children develop the same way. So probably there are children without sexual feelings, I'm not experienced in any way in psychology to say for sure but I know that development is different for everyone.

                  And the last thing that plays a part in this is memory. We do not remember things completely as they were. Especially in childhood. As adults we try to make sense of our past and create a narrative that makes sense for us. But it never is completely right because we'll interpret memories however we think they were but we can never achieve the whole "truth". Plus we only remember part of them.

                  So... My opinion in the end I guess is, if as an adult and a teenager a woman is a woman who feels sexual attraction for women only, they are lesbians. Because these stages in life are the stages in which our sexual feelings are developed and our memories and vocabulary use don't betray us so much anymore.

                  [–]VioletRemi 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

                  You know, puberty can start around 8-9 years. And bump of hormones can make you think a lot of things :)

                  [–]biggreensunglasses 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

                  So around age 7 I was convinced I had a crush on my then BFF Stuart (lol no sorry Stuart)

                  Then at 10 I had what I would now describe as my first ABSOLUTE OBSESSION and that was Wendy. I didn't realise it was a crush at the time, because 10, and not aware of sexuality, but in hindsight it definitely was.

                  [–]Jessica1993 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

                  Bisexual lesbians are not a thing and will never be a thing

                  [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

                  Agreed!

                  [–]SailorMoon2020 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

                  I believe in that thread some people may be confusing crushes for admiration. I also believe some of the comments the users may be in denial of their bisexuality. There are also a few comments I disagree with such as kids not having libido or sexual desire.

                  Are Lesbians capable of attraction to males up until a certain point in their lives? 

                  I said it before and I'll say it again. Not only is the word lesbian a stolen word from a small culture east of Greece, but it was never historically used nor meant to mean exclusive to women.

                  [–]VioletRemi 10 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 0 fun11 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

                  Historically no one believed that woman can love only women and not love men at all, until women's liberations in the last century and LGB achievements. And even nowadays, in majority places of the world people still not believing.

                  [–]SailorMoon2020 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

                  Ayo, Violet! I agree with you. What my comment is saying is, the word lesbian was never a word meant for us, homosexual females. As radical as this sounds, I think it's a word we should give back.

                  The word lesbian to me is like the word Christian. There are so many demoninations, still, a Christian is someone who believes Jesus is the Messiah. Lesbian has all these demoninations, still, it is a woman who fancies women.

                  Homosexual, the word is like homo sapian. It can't be assumed, or mixed, or twisted. It is exclusive by definition.

                  [–]VioletRemi 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

                  Word lesbian does not have any of those denotiations, same as word gay. They are appearing only now, mostly from side of transwomen and transmen, who are calling themselves "transbians". And they already twisted word homosexual as well :)

                  [–]SailorMoon2020 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

                  I disagree with the word 'gay' since the word is a slang word which originally meant 'happy' and 'flamborant'.

                  I agree with you saying those trans are twisting words and meanings with delusion.

                  I was about to agree you to be on your comment about the womens' liberation and the order lesbian bring made exclusive. This is because I couldn't think of any historical books after 1940's regarding female homosexuality as well as womens' sexual liberation that I have read. That is until I remembered just several months ago I read two books: We Walk Alone and We Too Must Love by Ann Aldrich. The books were written in and about that era of 1960's-1980's, I believe. Even during this era among these newly found women, the word lesbian still had a connotation that included both homosexual and bisexual women, that lesbian means to prefer and not exclude.

                  Edit: grammar

                  [–]Jessica1993 6 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

                  You're completely full of shit and just making stuff up, i will block you so i won't have the displeasure of reading anymore of your dumb posts, you're just as bad as the TRAs claiming they can be lesbians

                  [–]Jessica1993 8 insightful - 3 fun8 insightful - 2 fun9 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

                  If you don't believe lesbians are female homosexuals why are you even on a lesbian sub you moron ?

                  [–]SailorMoon2020 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

                  English is not my first nor second language so I won't make judgements for you completely not understanding my comments to Violet.

                  I am explaining to Violet the history of the word Lesbian. Just in case you do not know the history of the word.

                  It is a word that means those who are from the island of Lesbos, a small country the east of Greek. The word in its usage now is not the original meaning of the word. It was stolen due to Sappho herself being from the island of Lesbos.

                  I was explaining to Violet why I do not like the word. I told her I do not like the word lesbian because

                  1.) It's a stolen word from a culture not of America

                  2.) It's a word that historically never meant to be exclusive. Therefore, it's easy to manipulate and twist as Violent has mentioned in her comments.

                  I, myself, prefer homosexual female because it is a scientific term that explains exactly what I am. The term was also not stolen from a whole other country and culture. And by definition it can not be twisted.

                  Yes, you can block me.