all 18 comments

[–]EndlessSunflowers[S] 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (16 children)

Funny when I see clueless people talk about KKKarl Marxxx but have never read his works, they only know what they're told about him, and then they end up on the side of shadow corporations / scum of the earth, oof

[–]jet199 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

Maybe you should look at his life as much a read his work.

I judge people by their actions not their words and in this he very much did not practice what he preached.

[–]AntiSemit 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Oh, he did. He preached that Jews are to be abolished, and he practiced by not only creating the most antisemitic movement, but also by calling Ferdinand Lassalle a Jewish-Nigger.

Marx very much practiced exactly what he preached. The fact that Anti-Cosmopolitan Campaign and China exposing Long-Nose Tribe happened is no accident. Marxism is fundamentally antisemitism. It cannot be separated from antisemitism because Marxism sprang from antisemitism, and it will return to antisemitism.

[–]InvoluntaryHalibut 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (10 children)

I agree that comparing marx to the KKK is absurd but he and other communists mean to enslave all workers to a tiny elite. Government is a corporation. Government is not necessarily for the people and it certainly isn’t for the people under the current communist regime.

“Government is magic” or “Government loves you” is an irrational belief, its a scam to institute more feudalism.

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (8 children)

It would be another story if there were safeguards against the corruption, unfairness, and exploitation of ideas, including but not just Marx. The powers that shouldn't be don't want safeguards and would oppress and suppress them if there were.

[–]InvoluntaryHalibut 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

Like legal safeguards? Haven’t we already tried that shit? If you try to control society through lawyers the lawyers become corrupt. Lawyers and judges are just corrupt priests of the “government is magic” religion.

There are natural safeguards against corruption and unfairness. When everyone in a society is closely related to each other, like Iceland for example, there is incentive not to screw each other over, because of the selfish gene concept.

Also people that are related tend to evolve under a common set of cultural rules, and are more able to follow those rules than a genetic “outsider”.

Cultural rules are not just taught— we evolve to exploit them more efficiently. Different cultural regimes make sense for different environments. Europeans have been evolving under totally different conditions from Sub-saharan africans or other genetic groups. Its absurd that you can get everybody to follow the same set of rules by passing a bunch of laws.

A large number of the bankers, lawyers, political class, media have evolved within a cultural regime totally different than the typical european. Their survival strategy is to live within and off of other people’s societies while remaining exclusive and distinct culturally and genetically. Like all other societies, they exist to benefit themselves. The unfairness of their strategy to others is irrelevant to them. You are expecting that a related group of people within the bureaucracy will implement policies to protect the larger population from themselves. They are never going to do that.

[–]copenseethe 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

"bankers, lawyers, political class, media"

Are you talking about the Episcopalians?

[–]InvoluntaryHalibut 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Its the presbyterians! Read between the lines!

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

Any safeguards.

Yes, the legal/judicial system is centralized. Decentralization would keep things more fair - including the monopoly on violence, removing another safeguard.

Iceland also doesn't have cities where you can be virtually anonymous in the middle of millions.

Indeed, their cultural engineering via immigrants, racism, gender, etc. are very disruptive, intentionally.

[–]Bigs 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

Legal safeguards? I think as someone once said of the American constitution sums it up perfectly:

"Either the constitution allows all the thing that have happened, or it has proven to be useless at preventing them. Pick one?"

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

[–]Bigs 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Well that would be the first choice, that it allows them and so proves useless at preventing them - but take an amused upvote anyway

[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Monopoly is the game, but hypocrisy is how they play it.

[–]AntiSemit 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Are you one of those Judeo-Bolsheviks who look at the Judeo-Bolshevik infestation of the Marxist movement and think to yourself "yeah, these kikes represent Marxism. Never mind the fact that Marxism is applied antisemitism, or that Marx wrote an entire letter just dissing a filthy heeb-nosed merchant."

[–]bjam27 2 insightful - 4 fun2 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 4 fun -  (1 child)

He was a racist.

[–]InvoluntaryHalibut 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

That is so anti-semitic.

[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Demonizing Marx is about as clever as demonizing Trump or Plato or anyone for not being perfect and omnipotent while ignoring the spin, corruption, and perversion of the political actors who exploit and divide different views.

[–]adultmanhwa 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

But to be fair guys : china using communism (based on marx) to achieve its greatness today, and now people can't say China as a pure communist but more totalitarian capitalism.

this kind of thing is fated to the plebs so you have no vote, the only thing people can directly vote is anarchism.