you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]DffrntDrmmr 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

Welfare for the wealthy?

Some people around here use the term "socialism" too broadly. It's a term describing a socio-economic system (one where the government primarily owns the means of production).

"Socialism" does not mean "social," "society" (though they're derived from the same root word) or "welfare."

Please try to evolve your grasp of the word. Improper usage of it makes communication difficult.

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

What do you call welfare for the poor?

Who runs the government and the corporations? The corporatocracy ruling class, same shit for capitalists and communists, just different titles.

You seem to be among the minority that is trying to redefine what has been established for decades and centuries.

If you like, we can settle this in our public forum. You won't like the results.

[–]DffrntDrmmr 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

What do you call welfare for the poor?

Welfare?

You seem to be among the minority that is trying to redefine what has been established for decades and centuries.

You're so fucking clueless.

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

He's a lot more right than you are.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Your grasp of the word is pure Orwellian Newspeak communist propaganda though. You master that aspect very well, it seems.