all 4 comments

[–]MBMayfair 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Good grief - sort that reddit thread by controversial to see how many comments were removed. That's pathetic.

[–]TransspeciesUnicornI sexually identify as a mythical sparkly equine 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Is this at least partially due to puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones? Interesting to see all the removed comments.

[–]wafflegaffWoman. SuperBi. 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

[–]MBMayfair 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Thanks! It's what I expected: trans people falling all over themselves to try and figure out any supposed flaws in the study so they can claim it's inaccurate. They all suddenly start writing as if they're actual research scientists critiquing a study, until they go back to jerking off in their hentai forums.

It kind of reminds me of how, after adoring everything about the Harry Potter series for years, they suddenly claim it's actually "poorly written", that JKR is a "hack writer", that it's racist, etc. You know, their usual mental gymnastics.