you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]PenseePansyBio-Sex or Bust 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Hopefully, Allison's courage here will lead to Stonewall being successfully sued by Garden Court Chambers. Into oblivion, with any luck :)

[–]reluctant_commenter[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Oh they're suing Stonewall? I thought they were doing an appeal. This article suggests that they might appeal.

edit: To be clear, I would love for them to sue Stonewall, lol.

[–]PenseePansyBio-Sex or Bust 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Not so far! But it seems a distinct possibility. (Disclaimer: not a lawyer, unless an affinity for legal dramas counts.) After all, Garden Court Chambers has to pay up now; doesn't it make sense that they'd try recouping the money that Stonewall has cost them from Stonewall itself?

[–]reluctant_commenter[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

After all, Garden Court Chambers has to pay up now; doesn't it make sense that they'd try recouping the money that Stonewall has cost them from Stonewall itself?

Ahahaha, your first mistake was thinking logically!

I think it's more likely they'll double down on gender ideology, and thus challenge Allison. Suing Stonewall would require them to take the stance that Stonewall's advice is garbage... which would require GCC to stand up for objective reality. And trans ideology still has a firm grip on all major social media networks. From what I watched of the Allison Bailey trial, it seemed that many people at GCC were apathetic about the topic and a vocal minority really wanted to double down on claims such as "sex doesn't exist!" and "lesbians not wanting to date transwomen is sexual racism"-- I think that vocal pro-trans support might win out.

(If you like legal drama, I'm watching this video of Dr. Shannon Curry's testimony in the Amber Heard trial-- Amber's lawyer is arguing with her about personality disorders.)

[–]PenseePansyBio-Sex or Bust 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Ahahaha, your first mistake was thinking logically!

LOL which is to say... more like an actual lawyer than these weapons-grade dumbasses :)

But, believe it or not, that gives me some hope with regard to the following:

I think it's more likely they'll double down on gender ideology, and thus challenge Allison. Suing Stonewall would require them to take the stance that Stonewall's advice is garbage... which would require GCC to stand up for objective reality. And trans ideology still has a firm grip on all major social media networks.

But Rellie... your first mistake was thinking logically! (As a wise woman once said.) Or, rather, crediting GCC with having the capacity to do so! Here's what I mean: you laid out a logical reason why they wouldn't sue Stonewall-- one itself based on logic, in fact (i.e., that doing so would contradict support for trans ideology). The thing is, such a violation of logic would only bother (or even occur to) those who think logically, correct? Which, as we've already established, does NOT include those at GCC!

Perhaps the very thing which has caused GCC to do so much damage will also be our salvation in the end. Their hopelessness at logic. So they needn't ever recognize how wrong they've been in order to strike a blow against Stonewall. No, they may well do so still while thinking they're BFFs. Unable to perceive the contradiction. But serving our purposes-- and those of all gender-woo-rejecting people-- nonetheless.

And hopefully dealing themselves, as well as Stonewall, a death-blow into the bargain :)