you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]TransspeciesUnicornI sexually identify as a mythical sparkly equine 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

For KimiORabu, I actually saw them attacking another user on s/lesbians yesterday. They called her a "breeder" because she mentioned she has a son.

My 1 year old son

Oh look! A breeder is in a lesbian space to push their homophobic agenda. What more did I expect from a breeder

They also have a couple posts where they seem to deny that heterosexuality is a legitimate thing.

I don't believe the majority are "straight". They may feel or identify as such. Doesn't make it true. Anecdotes aren't reliable evidence

"Straight" is not the default. We are not computer programs. Whoever accused y'all of homophobia was right

I believe that test has merit. Although most humans are too homophobic to accept it, it may very well be that no woman or man is "straight"

Then there's... this:

The only solution is humanity's extinction. At least 2,000 years of humanity brainwashing each other with religion, heterosexism, etc and it's still ongoing. I'd put an end to everyone else, and then myself, until nothing is left, if I were given access to the bombs. If there were a button that put an end to everyone and everything, that would be the ideal.

Personally, I'm not convinced that this is a real person. This definitely seems like a potential troll. They've been a saidditer for a year but don't have all that much post history to show for it. Most of their post history is from 6 to 9 months ago, then nothing until they posted on s/lesbians yesterday. So their last post on s/LGBDropTheT was from 6 months ago, yet now they request entry as soon as it goes down? It seems suspicious. I guess it's possible that they could have just been lurking, but my gut says this is a troll.

So I'd personally give this user a PROBABLY NOT rating.

[–]yousaythosethingsFind and Replace "gatekeeping" with "having boundaries" 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Hard no. Thanks for the insight.

[–]ArthnoldManacatsaman🇬🇧🌳🟦 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's two thumbs down from me too.