LGB HistoryGay Heroes- Ric Grenell, the first gay U.S. cabinet official 🇺🇸 🏳️‍🌈

submitted by PatsyStoneMaverique from self.LGBDropTheT

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]RedEyedWarriorGay | Male | 🇮🇪 Irish 🇮🇪 | Antineoliberal | Cocks are Compulsory 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Oh yeah, the pro-gay marriage side has definitely done a lot of damage in America. In Ireland too, to a lesser extent. During the referendum, there were gay marriage supporters who called opponents and people who were on the fence homophobic, and some of these supporters even took down signs that they did not like. This angered a lot of reasonable gay marriage supporters, who threatened to vote no if that behaviour continued, so campaigners of the yes side began disavowing the charlatans. RTÉ actively took a neutral stance, even criticising yes activists for the conduct of the yes side. This is RTÉ, a neoliberal propaganda organisation backed by our corrupt government - even they were enforcing a balance in the debate.

Gay marriage will remain legal in Ireland forever, unless the government withdraws from the institution of marriage, which I’m not against. In such a scenario, you would not need marriage, only wills and power of attorney documents. The churches would still hold weddings, but they’d have no legal effect. Part of me thinks that marriage should just be a religious thing, while the other part thinks that as long as the government is involved in it, it should be open to gay couples. But I think living together and holding yourselves out as a couple should be enough. Or at least to sign a document that declares the couple as a legal entity. Laws against rape, age of consent laws and laws against duress should be enough to ensure that no one is being abused.

In America, there should be a contingency plan in case Obergefell is overturned. Personally, given that marriage is devolved to the states in America, it should have been decided by the states. Almost all Americans now would support civil unions at the very least. Hopefully if Obergefell is overturned, most states would choose to keep gay marriage legal.

I am a minarchist. Which means I believe in a small government with limited government interference. But for that to succeed, you need tightly-knit communities. We don’t have those anymore. But I would like to achieve that by building communities.

[–]PatsyStoneMaverique[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

During the referendum, there were gay marriage supporters who called opponents and people who were on the fence homophobic, and some of these supporters even took down signs that they did not like. This angered a lot of reasonable gay marriage supporters, who threatened to vote no if that behaviour continued, so campaigners of the yes side began disavowing the charlatans.

This was so wise, it's likely why they won. To put it mildly, this is not the way our version of the Yes campaign went about things. They had a very totalitarian, puritanical witch-hunt approach which has now taken over the entire left. Lol at RTÉ feigning neutrality. Our paltry version of that is NPR and it's like listening to psychological programming at a woke reeducation camp.

In America, there should be a contingency plan in case Obergefell is overturned. Personally, given that marriage is devolved to the states in America, it should have been decided by the states. Almost all Americans now would support civil unions at the very least. Hopefully if Obergefell is overturned, most states would choose to keep gay marriage legal.

As these things go, it's a process that takes several years because it involves court cases that have to make it through a couple of rounds of trials before they reach the national court (the Supreme Court.) The current court as it stands will overturn Obergefell and a couple of Justices have made public statements that they intend to. The majority opinion on Obergefell argued that couples have a "right to dignity" guaranteed in the U.S. Constitution. That's difficult to prove.

Honestly, after ten years of arguing against gender theory, gay marriage as a concept is going to be too vulnerable to the same counterarguments that gender identity is. It is guaranteed to lose vote after vote.

Civil unions fulfill the same functional purpose without all of the philosophical baggage. You can get homophobic people to vote for civil unions out of tolerance or a desire to increase economic stability. I think at some point someone will take some political leadership and start mounting campaigns for civil unions in the U.S.. Probably beginning in the interior of the country. I'm a little nobody but I've certainly volunteered in elections many times and I intend to show up for these campaigns with bells on. It's the future.

[–]RedEyedWarriorGay | Male | 🇮🇪 Irish 🇮🇪 | Antineoliberal | Cocks are Compulsory 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Your media apparatus is as bad as ours. At least you have multiple news outlets, whereas here we just have RTÉ and Virgin Media.

Civil unions are certainly preferable to nothing. And even nothing is preferable to the sodomy laws being reinstated. Which hopefully is unlikely.

[–]PatsyStoneMaverique[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

I think we'll have to weather some attempts at reinstating sodomy laws, but I'm confident they aren't going to be successful. It's going to be very ugly for a while.

I've never heard of Virgin Media, I guess I should feel lucky. The U.S. has absolutely awful media.

[–]RedEyedWarriorGay | Male | 🇮🇪 Irish 🇮🇪 | Antineoliberal | Cocks are Compulsory 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Virgin Media are not as bad as RTÉ. That’s all I can say.

I hope the sodomy laws don’t come back. If they do, I urge gay people in those affected states to buy guns.

[–]PatsyStoneMaverique[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Lol they probably already have them, given which states we're talking about. There isn't nearly the appetite to reinstate sodomy laws that there is to get rid of gay marriage. Most gay marriage opponents see it as an infringement of their rights or a risk to their rights, whereas gay sex is seen by these same people as something private that doesn't involve them.

There are obviously Christians who would support it, but my guess would be not even a third of the amount of people who would vote against gay marriage.

[–]RedEyedWarriorGay | Male | 🇮🇪 Irish 🇮🇪 | Antineoliberal | Cocks are Compulsory 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That’s good to here. Private sexual behaviours between consenting adults in private should be legal everywhere.