you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]IridescentAnacondastrictly dickly 22 insightful - 2 fun22 insightful - 1 fun23 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

No: you can lay your money on them trying to make us look bad. Given that they are highly trained in manipulating people to divulge information or otherwise provide fodder for bad optics, and most lay people are not trained very well in media relations, I would say it's a highly risky endeavor.

[–]CancelPowerSuper Bi Male[S] 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

I think it's very risky because Fox News is a right-wing outlet but very rewarding if successful, many people still don't know that LGB and the gender cult aren't the same things. An interview on TV would be very helpful in spreading the awareness that being same-sex attracted /= being trans or making up genders.

[–]xanditAGAB (Assigned Gay at Birth) 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

tucker knows

[–]IridescentAnacondastrictly dickly 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

That's a fair point, but I'd make sure that the interviewee is trained in media relations.

[–]CancelPowerSuper Bi Male[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Definitely, nobody wants what happened with r/antiwork and Doreen to happen here.