you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]CancelPowerSuper Bi Male[S] 19 insightful - 1 fun19 insightful - 0 fun20 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

"Neo-vagina verses ‘natural’ vagina shouldn’t even be a consideration, as OP says, they’re more or less the same. Saying no is honestly just transphobic. 🤷‍♀️" - Rapist in making.

"Would you fuck a neo-vagina? Be honest" "No" "Wait, what do you mean no"? - Another rapist that doesn't take "no" for an answer.

Also I find some of the comments a bit worrisome, always desperately trying to remove the "neo" and make it seem like a neo-vagina and vaginas are the same. Like this one.

[–]IridescentAnacondastrictly dickly 19 insightful - 1 fun19 insightful - 0 fun20 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Le sigh. Either it consists of non-elastic skin (originally from the "uncorrected" vagina aka penis) or mucosa from the sigmoid colon. The vaginal canal lies significantly below the labia, which themselves are quite variable in terms of how much they resemble skin from the scrotum lower part of the uncorrected vagina. That's just the basic facts applied to all neo-vaginas. Then you have the significant prevalence of persistent foul odor (30% if I recall), granulation and scar tissue, and a non-negligible risk of rectal fistula.

But, sure, there's no difference, none at all 🙄

[–]ChunkeeguyTeam T*RF Fuck Yeah 11 insightful - 10 fun11 insightful - 9 fun12 insightful - 10 fun -  (0 children)

"I'm curious as to how you could have the affrontery to disagree with a womxn of trans..."