all 34 comments

[–]Tikiri 30 insightful - 14 fun30 insightful - 13 fun31 insightful - 14 fun -  (0 children)

None of the positive responses seem to be from actual women (shocker).🙄

[–]hufflepuff-poet 29 insightful - 1 fun29 insightful - 0 fun30 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Homophobic rapists. Genital preference is the new way to disparage homosexuality as "perverted, wrong, unnatural, nonexistent, a fetish". Lesbians don't want dick, intact and erect or sliced in half and stuffed in the pelvic cavity. 🤢🤢🤢

[–]GenderSpecial 21 insightful - 1 fun21 insightful - 0 fun22 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Not only that, calling it a “genital preference” is a backdoor way of saying “if someone gets bottom surgery, they’re no different from a biological male/female”.

“Genital preferences are valid” is homophobia and denies the immutable nature of sexual attraction.

[–]CleverFoolOfEarth 15 insightful - 10 fun15 insightful - 9 fun16 insightful - 10 fun -  (4 children)

or sliced in half and stuffed in the pelvic cavity.

Friend, as a bisexual woman let me assure you completely that there is nobody on the face of God's green Earth that wants dissected dick.

[–]hufflepuff-poet 14 insightful - 3 fun14 insightful - 2 fun15 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Welp trans lurkers, ya heard it here first--nobody wants you after you've topsy-turvied your genitals! Not homosexuals, not bisexuals and since most of y'all refuse to date each other, you already know no heterosexual wants inside-out, outside-in genitals 🤷🏾‍♀️🤷🏾‍♀️🤷🏾‍♀️

[–]hellonumpty 11 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 0 fun12 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I second this as a bisexual woman. 🙋🏻‍♀️🙋🏻‍♀️

[–]PenseePansyBio-Sex or Bust 10 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 0 fun11 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

there is nobody on the face of God's green Earth that wants dissected dick

Well... nobody you'd wanna meet in a dark alley, anyway! That's the thing: if you make your crotch disturbing, your dating pool will consist exclusively of those who are turned on by the disturbing. We're talking big-time serial-killer vibes here. So, yeah, people like that are out there-- creepy, make-your-skin-crawl people-- but I seriously doubt they're what these I-wanna-be-a-cute-lesbian-girl-uwu guys are looking for. (Plus those who'd find body-horror genitals appealing must be at least 95% male.)

[–]wafflegaffWoman. SuperBi. 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

That's the thing: if you make your crotch disturbing, your dating pool will consist exclusively of those who are turned on by the disturbing

My sense of gallows humor thanks you for this laugh.

[–]MyLongestJourney 27 insightful - 1 fun27 insightful - 0 fun28 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

"But, our trans bodies deserve to be celebrated too! Our bodies deserve to be wanted, and viewed as sexy and beautiful too"

Nobody deserves that actually. You are not entitled to other people's sexual interest.

[–]GenderSpecial 16 insightful - 1 fun16 insightful - 0 fun17 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻

[–]Rosefield 15 insightful - 1 fun15 insightful - 0 fun16 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

"But, our trans bodies deserve to be celebrated too! Our bodies deserve to be wanted, and viewed as sexy and beautiful too"

And they want all this from people who aren't attracted to them and desperatly try to push them into dating trans people. Not gonna happen. Neither sex nor sexuality can be changed.

[–]hufflepuff-poet 10 insightful - 8 fun10 insightful - 7 fun11 insightful - 8 fun -  (0 children)

Wh--aaaat?!?!? That's bigotry, we all must celebrate and self-flagellate at the altar of their "sacred and divine trans bodies". We owe trans people our very existence, the least we can do is fuck them on demand right??

/😒

[–]ChunkeeguyTeam T*RF Fuck Yeah 11 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 0 fun12 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Well then wy don't you celebrate them then instead of claiming you were born in the wrong one and trying get bits removed and/or added?

[–]Finnegan7921 21 insightful - 1 fun21 insightful - 0 fun22 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I generally don't read the threads, but holy shit the amount of lies and delusions is astounding. Never ceases to amaze when I do read them.

[–]CancelPowerSuper Bi Male[S] 19 insightful - 1 fun19 insightful - 0 fun20 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

"Neo-vagina verses ‘natural’ vagina shouldn’t even be a consideration, as OP says, they’re more or less the same. Saying no is honestly just transphobic. 🤷‍♀️" - Rapist in making.

"Would you fuck a neo-vagina? Be honest" "No" "Wait, what do you mean no"? - Another rapist that doesn't take "no" for an answer.

Also I find some of the comments a bit worrisome, always desperately trying to remove the "neo" and make it seem like a neo-vagina and vaginas are the same. Like this one.

[–]IridescentAnacondastrictly dickly 19 insightful - 1 fun19 insightful - 0 fun20 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Le sigh. Either it consists of non-elastic skin (originally from the "uncorrected" vagina aka penis) or mucosa from the sigmoid colon. The vaginal canal lies significantly below the labia, which themselves are quite variable in terms of how much they resemble skin from the scrotum lower part of the uncorrected vagina. That's just the basic facts applied to all neo-vaginas. Then you have the significant prevalence of persistent foul odor (30% if I recall), granulation and scar tissue, and a non-negligible risk of rectal fistula.

But, sure, there's no difference, none at all 🙄

[–]ChunkeeguyTeam T*RF Fuck Yeah 11 insightful - 10 fun11 insightful - 9 fun12 insightful - 10 fun -  (0 children)

"I'm curious as to how you could have the affrontery to disagree with a womxn of trans..."

[–]ChunkeeguyTeam T*RF Fuck Yeah 16 insightful - 1 fun16 insightful - 0 fun17 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

A neo vagina is what trans women call their vagina after it’s been anatomically corrected by surgery (aka after bottom surgery)

We are losing a generation - and not just of LGB people.

[–]Finnegan7921 15 insightful - 10 fun15 insightful - 9 fun16 insightful - 10 fun -  (0 children)

I saw them referred to as "inverted penis stink-ditches". Sounded about right.

[–]Rosefield 16 insightful - 1 fun16 insightful - 0 fun17 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Transbians can all date each other. But pretending the other men are women only goes so far.

Also this bloke is asking the question on the biggest penisbian hugbox on Reddit. Of course nearly everyone says they want to get near a destroyed dick. He is already planning to get his penis ruined so he is in for a big surprise when lesbians still reject his male ass

[–]chazzstrong 14 insightful - 4 fun14 insightful - 3 fun15 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

I actually laughed out loud when I got to the post that asked if they could feel anything, and the OP responded 'especially with clitoral stimulation'. This is the deepest seed of delusion.

[–]eng 12 insightful - 4 fun12 insightful - 3 fun13 insightful - 4 fun -  (1 child)

don't ask questions you don't want to know the answers to

[–]wafflegaffWoman. SuperBi. 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

There's a joke about traps in here somewhere.

[–]NoaRaccoon 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Why aren't they okay with pan/bi/all good/ people dating them? To me, it seems abusive and agressive to INSIST to date monosexual people. heteros included. Why aren't heteros flooded on their forum, on the point of no recognition? They are truly lucky in this regard. They have films, series, magazines, bars, reddit subs- we, lesbians have NOTHING left.

[–]CleverFoolOfEarth 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Because surprise surprise, we don't want 'em either. Between the uncanny appearance and the abhorrent personalities, absolutely not.

[–]wafflegaffWoman. SuperBi. 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Because bi / pan people can (in theory—their theory; as a bisexual person, I might see and accept them as they are but I will surely not sleep with them) see and accept them as they are, rather than having to join them in a delusion and pretend that they're something else (biological women). They don't want to be seen accurately, they want to be validated as what they aren't.

[–]wafflegaffWoman. SuperBi. 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

There was so much sus hugboxing I missed the "no" part. Did that one get deleted?

[–]MBMayfair 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

It looks like it did, but the replies are still there. My favorite comment though is the one that reads simply "No." OP asked a question, got an answer.

[–]CancelPowerSuper Bi Male[S] 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

What the hell? It existed just yesterday (I even linked to it in my comment) and the post is old (4 months ago) Besides, the comments weren't even offensive, not even slightly.

Is anybody using this website to report comments or something? Yikes. Good thing the automod saves snapshots I guess.

[–]wafflegaffWoman. SuperBi. 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Well, here's the first archive. I made a second one for comparison and I do see that the one you are referring to was deleted. I couldn't find it in the commenter's feed either. I don't remember how deletion works on Reddit when it's done by a mod vs. the commenter doing it themselves so I'm not sure how to interpret its absence. But I'd be willing to bet that person got some nasty private messages.

https://archive.ph/elmc2

[–]CancelPowerSuper Bi Male[S] 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Oh no, you misunderstood, I know that the comment was removed. I was just expressing my surprise because the post is 4 months old and mods don't delete or moderate old comments, it surprised me that right after I posted it here it got removed just the next day which means that some people here are using this site as a way to report "problematic" comments not to mention that the original comment wasn't even offensive not even a bit so I have no idea why the hell the mods removed it.

[–]wafflegaffWoman. SuperBi. 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yes, that's not likely to be a coincidence.

There's no way in which that whole post and removing that comment aren't just silly.

[–]automoderatorHuman-Exclusionary Radical Overlord[M] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

RIP Snappy, I AM THE NEW GOD!

Click below to view and/or archive snapshots:

If this comment is being added for sites which cannot be usefully archived - for example, video hosts or an existing archive site - please let the Moderators know by sending ModMail. REPLIES TO THIS COMMENT ARE NOT SEEN BY MODS

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this sub if you have any questions or concerns.