all 39 comments

[–]hufflepuff-poet 20 insightful - 5 fun20 insightful - 4 fun21 insightful - 5 fun -  (1 child)

As long as you choose to abandon any real feminist project like wage parity & decreasing actual incidents of sexual assault in pursuit of ruining the lives of trans women, in your misguided misandrist venture

They know. They're liars.

[–]TransspeciesUnicornI sexually identify as a mythical sparkly equine 17 insightful - 4 fun17 insightful - 3 fun18 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

"Misandrist" Ha ha! Freudian slip!

Also it's kind of hard for a lot of feminists to accomplish much these days when they're getting deplatformed and terf'd and feathered out of town if they don't completely kowtow to trans ideology.

[–][deleted] 20 insightful - 1 fun20 insightful - 0 fun21 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

decreasing actual incidents of sexual assault

You know what helps decrease that? Single sex spaces. Perverted men fuck off.

[–]Femaleisnthateful 18 insightful - 1 fun18 insightful - 0 fun19 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Lol 'women should be focused on fighting for their rights'. We're not even allowed to have a name for ourselves, or a concrete definition.

[–]JulienMayfair 16 insightful - 1 fun16 insightful - 0 fun17 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

With apologies to anyone in this demographic in this group, this week has been, "Are young people really this stupid?" week for me. People freaked out about "the rights of the unborn" have been trying to overturn Roe v. Wade since it was passed, and it really went into high gear during the 1980s. And then we have this weird system of nominating Supreme Court justices that relies on who happens to be POTUS at the time and who happens to die.

For example, looking back, as good as RBG was, she should have had the sense to retire in the 3rd year of Obama's second term rather than trying to run the clock out and dying at the most inopportune moment.

[–]Q-Continuum-kin 13 insightful - 1 fun13 insightful - 0 fun14 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

I believe RBG said she wanted to retire under Hillary Clinton so she tried to hang on for more time. The expectation was Clinton was going to win in 2008 but Obama won and was still a Democrat so she could have easily retired but the expectation was then that Clinton was going to win in 2016. The entire government and media dismissed Trump so much that they didn't even consider it possible that he could win.

Then Scalia died and it opened up the chance for democrats to permanently shift the court in a liberal direction. Democrats then sat back and refused to do anything over republicans doing a procedural block on the replacement because they all kept thinking Clinton was an automatic win.

RBG had this weird fetishistic following and they all thought it would be some amazing thing for RBG to retire under the first female president. Their annoying liberal obsession with tokenism actually ruined the outcome that they ultimately wanted.

[–]JulienMayfair 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Obama's failure to push harder to replace Scalia is one of those things about his character as POTUS that I don't understand. I know he wanted to be someone who played by the rules, but I think he could have been a LOT more aggressive in terms of finding some way to force the issue.

And Mitch McConnell . . . the embodiment of a sleazy player. He knows 100% what Trump is, but still wouldn't vote to impeach.

[–]GreykittymommaMagical lady 💜 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Exactly this. Some fucking hero of women (both of them honestly)

[–]ChunkeeguyTeam T*RF Fuck Yeah[S] 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

So true

[–]chandra 13 insightful - 2 fun13 insightful - 1 fun14 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

Yeah, like what's the endgame for them? Like do they expect us to all detransition all of a sudden? What if some of us refuse? Are they gonna throw us in jail? Kill us? I mean, real talk time, a lot of them would never admit to it or even themselves. But that's the natural conclusion of their worldview.

What's with the histrionics? 'TERFs' just want men to fuck off out of women's spaces. That's literally it. They only want for you the same thing they want for all other men.

[–]hufflepuff-poet 13 insightful - 1 fun13 insightful - 0 fun14 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

No, I mean that the hatred of trans women by TERFs is at its core misdirected misandry. I mean it all checks, the way they use their sexual trauma to justify hurting others, the essentialization of gender traits, etc…

Of course trans women are women but that isn’t how the TERF mindset operates

I truly don't know how to talk with people who are this braindead...

How tf is a woman talking about her trauma, "hurting others"?? Unless you identify with the abuser...

[–]xanditAGAB (Assigned Gay at Birth) 11 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 0 fun12 insightful - 1 fun -  (11 children)

even the gay male subs are freaking out, and yes some blame the right wing gay male terfs in the sub

[–]CancelPowerSuper Bi Male 9 insightful - 4 fun9 insightful - 3 fun10 insightful - 4 fun -  (2 children)

Uh...right-wing gays are idiots tbh.

[–]IridescentAnacondastrictly dickly 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

We have our reasons. It's mostly about priorities. But, yes, in the US political system one has to choose between Sleazy/Corrupt and Crazy. Right now I'm registered with the Crazy party, it's a bit of a challenge to find the least crazy one to vote for in the primary.

[–]xanditAGAB (Assigned Gay at Birth) 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

they didn't cause abortion to fall because they are gender critical though. they are branding everyone who was remotely against "tm are men" as right wing.

[–]ElectraHeart 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

gay male subs

no such thing exists. the last bastion askgaybros fell a few days ago, getting institutionally captured. it was a long time coming, since gendies were really over the top with their brigading.

[–]hufflepuff-poet 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Wait, what happened to /askgaybros?

[–]SilverWolf 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

The original mod, who has been gone for over a year now, has officially been removed. The other two mods said basically nothing will change, just that they will continue to remove basic stuff like spam, not people they disagree with

[–]MarkJeffersonTight defenses and we draw the line 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Uh-oh. I hope that's actually true.

[–]ChunkeeguyTeam T*RF Fuck Yeah[S] 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Eventually a stealth transistor will sneak in as a mod and it will all be over.

[–]MarkJeffersonTight defenses and we draw the line 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Ironically, Because a sub of this type truly benefits from having less moderation, even an actual transistor as mod would be an infinitely better choice.

[–]ElectraHeart 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Head mod, who kept the peace and warded of the cult via being distant got replaced by the two guys he brought in, and i do not trust the new two ones. They did not show their true colors (or i have not seen it), but the aura of the sub is rapidly changing from gc to gendie.

[–]xanditAGAB (Assigned Gay at Birth) 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

what happened? is the new mod the censorish type?

[–]julesburm1891 10 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 0 fun11 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

How do you even talk with people this stupid? Show me where women opposed to men larping as us have been dismantling the right to choose. Because the same people they’re calling TERFs are the ones who’ve been fighting anti-choice advocates for years.

If anything, the queer movement removing the ability to talk about who this actually impacts had been a godsend for the right-wing.

[–]MyLongestJourney 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

At this stage,I would ally with Satan himself,just to see the TRA fuckers burn.

[–]Three_oneFourWanted for thought crimes in countless ideologies 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

So why exactly would feminists want to get rid of protections for real women? How on Earth would that spite men?

[–]wafflegaffWoman. SuperBi. 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Can someone pass the salad dressing?

https://archive.ph/TZRfo

[–]automoderatorHuman-Exclusionary Radical Overlord[M] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

RIP Snappy, I AM THE NEW GOD!

Click below to view and/or archive snapshots:

If this comment is being added for sites which cannot be usefully archived - for example, video hosts or an existing archive site - please let the Moderators know by sending ModMail. REPLIES TO THIS COMMENT ARE NOT SEEN BY MODS

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this sub if you have any questions or concerns.