you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Femaleisnthateful 17 insightful - 4 fun17 insightful - 3 fun18 insightful - 4 fun -  (6 children)

Anyone want to speculate on what that 'pre-cum' is?

[–]Q-Continuum-kin 14 insightful - 1 fun14 insightful - 0 fun15 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Puss coming out of the open wound.

[–][deleted] 9 insightful - 5 fun9 insightful - 4 fun10 insightful - 5 fun -  (4 children)

Just to give everyone a heads up ... we normally do not allow trans surgeries to be described in terms like "open wound" or "pus-filled", etc etc (rule 4), and would remove comments like this.

This comment using the terms/descriptions is allowed, because the OP herself literally described it as such:

they have a small open wound on the tip of their dick & the tip of the condom had some milky white liquid pooling

I personally apologize to those of you with an active vivid imagination. I didn't want to picture it in my head either.

[–]verystablegenius 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

if it is puss filled, why can’t it be described as so? maybe i need to go read rule 4

[–]justagaydude123 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

The pretense of respect. Way more than they give us.

[–]verystablegenius 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

sounds silly as it defeats the concept of free speech. but whatever.

[–]Q-Continuum-kin 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I think the point is to avoid personal attacks but they left my post up when it became relevant so it's clearly going to be allowed when it isn't just being hurled as an insult.