you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]PatsyStoneMaverique 10 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 0 fun11 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

They've already shot themselves in the foot by declaring this a "homosexual exclusive event." I wouldn't attend or support this event if I lived in New York, I would be stepping on toes and commiting various social sins if I even attempted to. It may be that bisexuals are allowed if they're gay enough, possibly, and can blend in and not attract too much attention.

Repeating the mistakes of the past and expecting a different result. Yes, this will be attacked relentlessly.

[–]Q-Continuum-kin 13 insightful - 2 fun13 insightful - 1 fun14 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

On top of that the TRAs literally do not care about definitions. A bunch of AGP will show up and believe they are homosexuals.

[–]wafflegaffWoman. SuperBi. 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This is the main problem (other than excluding bisexuals). How does one enforce people adhering to the correct meanings of words, when the entire problem is that they won't do so?

This is supposedly not happening until September, so there's plenty of time for who-knows-what to happen in the meantime that might influence going through with this.

[–]PatsyStoneMaverique 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

There are plenty of transwomen and transmen who are homosexuals, who I'm sure aren't going to approve of this and will try to sabotage it. Not to mention people who identify as homosexuals but know they aren't.

Hopefully they've thought about security a little.