all 14 comments

[–][deleted] 21 insightful - 8 fun21 insightful - 7 fun22 insightful - 8 fun -  (0 children)

Ok, then let's make a new term for a woman who is exclusively attracted to women. Let's say, super lesbian? Oh right, they hated when we did that.

[–]julesburm1891 15 insightful - 1 fun15 insightful - 0 fun16 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

The only thing I thought as reading this is about how the author is the type of person who will cause problems wherever they go. They’ll be the one who gets a useless degree (e.g. gender studies) at a private university and think it’s everyone else’s responsibility to pay their loans. They’ll be the one that never stops whining over trifling matters at work and pushes their job duties off on other people. They’re the one that will spend so much time navel gazing, they’ll destroy every relationship around them. And, no matter what, we’ll all hear about it.

[–]theytookourjerbsXX only. 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Yeah there's people that bought into gender things that thought I was a trans versus lesbian. There's already enough people trying to trans LGB and ASD people (even worse if it's somebody that both like me), and I don't want to be another one that does. I like being on the more masculine side and am comfortable with being a female anyways...

[–]reluctant_commenter 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Always amazes me the extent to which women who have traits/behaviors deemed "traditionally masculine" seem to break people's brains, lol. Same with men who are feminine. Like, no, just because I have some "guy hobbies" doesn't mean I am a guy inside. Why do so many people consider this to be progressive? Lol.

[–]theytookourjerbsXX only. 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Right? I don't understand how it's considered progressive either. Maybe it's because MSM said it was then they bought it idk.