you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]reluctant_commenter 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Really? You think the bar is that much lower in the midwest? Genuinely curious.

[–]Q-Continuum-kin 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Some states bias the mother to points of absurdity in custody battles. Don't know about MI in particular. If the fathers were actually as bad as they say then the mom must have been crazy

[–]julesburm1891 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

In the South and Midwest, the general consensus is that children should be with their mother. Well-adjusted men can get absolutely fucked in custody battles a lot of places in both region's. In real life, I’ve known the following women who’ve kept custody of her kids when the perfectly normal husband was denied: a woman with a history of drug abuse, a woman with serious mental illness, a woman who was unemployed, and a woman who made active threats of violence to her ex-husband.

[–]Riothamus 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I'm surprised the unemployed woman lost custody, honestly. From my experience that's not enough on its own. Did she have some sort of boyfriend issue (abusive, sketchy background, etc) that could have influenced the judge's decision?

But yeah- a Midwestern mother will lose custody if she's deranged, addicted, dysfunctional, abusive or dating a man with a combination of those traits.