you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]reluctant_commenter 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

There is a Twitter account called "LGB with the T"-- guess they're trying to copy our name. The profile says it's associated with a group called Trans Radio UK... what are the odds that this is a transgender-identified person claiming to speak for LGB? Lol.

[–][deleted] 8 insightful - 5 fun8 insightful - 4 fun9 insightful - 5 fun -  (4 children)

Oh hey, on that same note, and to give a giggle to everyone. I made r/LGBDropTheTERFs and r/lgbdropthetransphobia.

I snagged them because the kiddies of r/LGBT and r/GenderCynical thought it would be totes hilarious if they existed and acted as a middle finger to us. Thanks for the idea!

They were private and devoid of any members, and got banned during the Aimee Challenor purge for "promoting hate", LMAO.

Just made r/LGBWithTheT. What should I put on the splash page for why it's private? I'm thinking "TERF RIGHTS!", but am open to suggestion.

[–]wafflegaffWoman. SuperBi. 5 insightful - 5 fun5 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 5 fun -  (3 children)

What should I put on the splash page for why it's private?

"Helping lesbians learn to like dick and gay men learn to like pussy in peace and privacy since 2021."

(Unless you were thinking of some sort of blatant trolling, that is. Can't get my head in that game at the moment.)

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Trolling, for sure. Using their words/phrases, but in just the right way.

Can't use the phrase you said because it's too much LGBDropTheT - that would end up in a ban right away because it looks like I'm trying to collect people and reform our sub there under a different name.

Something stupid that would trigger their rage, but there's no loophole in the ever-expanding Reddit rule 1 that they can use to report it.

I'm open to memes also, I'll put an Imgur link on the splash page.

[–]wafflegaffWoman. SuperBi. 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

but there's no loophole in the ever-expanding Reddit rule

Geez we probably need to hire a lawyer to read them for us. I haven't been keeping up.

What would be even funnier is coming up with a loophole they would scramble to close once it was used to troll them.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

What would be even funnier is coming up with a loophole they would scramble to close once it was used to troll them.

That's what I want, for sure.