all 7 comments

[–]reluctant_commenter 11 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 0 fun12 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

No way. You can't force me to be part of the LGBTQIAWTFBBQ++. All right, I'm a "non-defined" now, I don't see an N listed in there.

Jokes aside, I am a big advocate for the 'Q' being returned to its original meaning, questioning, for people who are questioning. But the phrase, "choose not to define their sexual orientation" is a little misleading... nobody defines their sexual orientation, mother nature defines it and people observe it and describe it (accurately, ideally).

[–]bopomofodojo 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

mother nature defines it and people observe it and describe it (accurately, ideally).

Reminds me of another thing they deny... six? sax? sox? Something like that.

[–]PatsyStoneMaverique 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Honestly bi+ makes sense, there seem to be fifty different codewords and reinterpretations of bi these days, let's just categorize them as bi+.

Demisexual panromantic? Ah, yes, bi...+

Aromatic omnisexual? You'd be under... bi... oh, here it is..plus.

[–]Destresse🇨🇵 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

"bi+"....? Lol what is this again

[–]reluctant_commenter 6 insightful - 5 fun6 insightful - 4 fun7 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

"Bi" or "extra special bi," I guess?

[–]artetolife 5 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

Makes you wonder what you have to do to be top 10. Estrogen vending machines in the canteen?

[–]lunarstrain 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Hurry, someone come up with two new special identities that start with C and K. I want the new acronym all the pandering politicians have to say on live TV to be LGBTQUACK.