all 14 comments

[–]yousaythosethingsFind and Replace "gatekeeping" with "having boundaries" 21 insightful - 1 fun21 insightful - 0 fun22 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I blame myself for reading the post and skimming the comments but the saddest part is that everyone took this post seriously. The only proper response to this is “what the actual fuck” and “if this is real life, you all need more help than we can give.” It actually does sicken me that people use gay-associated language when saying “you never out someone” as a knee-jerk response to something like this. This is why fewer people are taking us seriously and even the supposed allies lump us in with fetishes and overall degeneracy.

[–]wafflegaffWoman. SuperBi. 14 insightful - 4 fun14 insightful - 3 fun15 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

The only proper response to this is “what the actual fuck”

Wokeism is the credulity Olympics.

[–]filbs111 8 insightful - 6 fun8 insightful - 5 fun9 insightful - 6 fun -  (0 children)

What would Jerry Springer make of all this?

[–]bolla_top 8 insightful - 6 fun8 insightful - 5 fun9 insightful - 6 fun -  (0 children)

TFW you are trying to troll, but it's impossible because everyone is so woke that they claim to innocently believe anything you say for fear of kink shaming or being judgmental.

[–]TransspeciesUnicornI sexually identify as a mythical sparkly equine 8 insightful - 3 fun8 insightful - 2 fun9 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

I am a part of the ecosexual community. Within it, there's a subgroup of those who are sexually attracted to trees

What the actual fuck is this. How is this not just someone trolling?

[–]book_hoarder 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Question: how does one have sex with a tree? And more importantly: how does fucking a tree not rub your dick raw?

[–]julesburm1891 13 insightful - 8 fun13 insightful - 7 fun14 insightful - 8 fun -  (0 children)

I can think of few things as horrifying as shoving a tree branch in my twat. That sounds like a war crime, not a fetish.

[–]lavender_menace 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I mean there are people who fuck statues. Apparently at Oscar Wildes cemetery there was a statue with a “dick” and some of his admirers used to come there. At some point that thing was filed down, because people complained. To answer your question. They probably use tools to smooth the edges for inside / round the branches for outside penetration. And probably use a wagon load of lube.

[–]book_hoarder 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

To answer your question. They probably use tools to smooth the edges for inside / round the branches for outside penetration.

So they flay or bore a hole into this poor tree for the explicit purposes of fucking it. Sounds horrifying.

[–]lavender_menace 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yes it does.

[–]MarkJeffersonTight defenses and we draw the line 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I think they just use their own items and attach them to the tree. They're probably simply being exploited as some naturalism-themed prop. The tree does not consent to this depravity, clearly. Treebeard would be horrified.

[–]IridescentAnacondastrictly dickly 6 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

r/thathappened

[–]NeedMoreCoffee~=[,,_,,]=^_^= 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Nope. I can't even.

[–]Elvira95Viva la figa 4 insightful - 5 fun4 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

when your love for nature goes too far..