Virtue SignalingWhen #LGBwiththeT stopped being enough of a narcissistic sustenance

submitted by [deleted] from i.imgur.com

all 10 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–][deleted] 38 insightful - 5 fun38 insightful - 4 fun39 insightful - 5 fun -  (2 children)

Choose kindness, understanding and inclusion

Ok, you fuckers do it first, because you certainly aren't being kind, understanding, or inclusive of homosexuality.

[–]wafflegaffWoman. SuperBi. 18 insightful - 1 fun18 insightful - 0 fun19 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Just so, so gross. Wrapping themselves in a virtue cloak touting principles they violate time and time again.

[–]julesburm1891 16 insightful - 1 fun16 insightful - 0 fun17 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Or of women in single-sex spaces where they’re giving free passes to any male predator if he says he’s a woman.

Or of men and women in single-sex spaces with nudity who have not consented to seeing the opposite sex naked.

Or of girls competing in sports.

Or of gender non-conforming kids who they’re angling to make life-long medical patients.

All of this “tolerance and inclusion” really seems to go only one way and disregard everyone else’s rights.

[–]Horror-SwordfishI don't get how flairs work 25 insightful - 4 fun25 insightful - 3 fun26 insightful - 4 fun -  (1 child)

Where is all this rampant transphobia in the media that people are talking about? That literally one article? Such drama queens. Most of the media caters to all of your bullshit and supports you and acts like you're amazing just for existing and nothing else.

Also, I'm not a woman, so I can't say for sure, but I'm pretty sure that women aren't sharing female-only space with trans women "all the time." Also also, I can't think of a single time that a trans woman has "had my back," certainly not "since forever."

[–]wafflegaffWoman. SuperBi. 10 insightful - 5 fun10 insightful - 4 fun11 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

It's funny that trans women would think that we are sharing all the time.

How would they know?

. . .

[–]GoValidateYourselfuseful lesbian 17 insightful - 1 fun17 insightful - 0 fun18 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

All of these vague phrases and platitudes and yet none of them address the actual core issues:

  1. are you tolerant of homosexuals being same-sex attracted?
  2. Do we have the right to free-association based on this? If not, why not?
  3. Do women have the right to free association based on our sex?
  4. Do female athletes have the right to compete exclusively with members of their sex?
  5. What are your opinions on the rampant, relentless, sexual harassment and abuse that the trans movement has inflicted on women and lesbians, gay men, and bisexual people, all clearly documented for all to see?

All these platitudes make these "inclusionists" look like ostriches, with their heads in the sand and asses in the air

[–]winterwillow 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Exactly! All I want to know is can I define my sexual orientation as a female only attracted to females i e homosexual/lesbian? Are such people as myself allowed our own spaces?

But they know they can’t answer those questions, since that would expose them as homophobes. Better to whine about survey sample sizes.

[–]xanditAGAB (Assigned Gay at Birth) 14 insightful - 1 fun14 insightful - 0 fun15 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

they are not understanding the real danger is the philosophy of same GENDER attraction, and all that comes with it, not rapists in the bathroom.

[–]Three_oneFourWanted for thought crimes in countless ideologies 10 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 0 fun11 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's a strawman. They're saying that we're just a group of people accusing them of being rapists so that they can discredit us and our argument.

[–]RippoffOfLoveSStraight | Overuses quotation marks 10 insightful - 3 fun10 insightful - 2 fun11 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

This reeks of "not all men"