Transing ChildrenSo many years of LGB proving that they don't turn kids into anything, just for TQ to come around and do exactly that...

submitted by [deleted] from i.imgur.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted]  (10 children)

[removed]

    [–]7874 18 insightful - 1 fun18 insightful - 0 fun19 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

    Just because you want a sexual partner doesn't mean you should have one, and it definitely doesn't mean you're mature enough to understand what that means and the potential consequences of a sexual relationship, especially at such a young age where even if you've been through puberty, many of your peers are prepubertal and attempting to penetrate a prepubertal girl is akin to torture. Some kids that age are feeling sexual arousal and for some it's still too early.

    And "polyamorous" isn't a biological identity like being homosexual. Feeling attraction to multiple people at once is normal.

    And I've been trying to be neutral, but you honestly burned my eyes. Your maternal great-grandmother had your grandmother at 14, meaning she was most likely pregnant at 13. The thought of that makes me sick. It's extremely easy for kids that age to die from pregnancy because their bodies aren't ready for childbirth; even though they've been through puberty, they're still growing at that age.

    Girls hitting puberty so early is likely not even natural and a consequence of estrogen (from animal agriculture) in the water supply.

    Every single whim shouldn't be indulged, especially when the whims are sexual and the people are children.

    [–]GreykittymommaMagical lady 💜 16 insightful - 1 fun16 insightful - 0 fun17 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    Thank you, that previous comment was very, very creepy.

    No, 10-14 year olds shouldn't have sex. Ever. There, I said it. Lock me up now for repressing their baby kink. BARF.

    "Don't worry, another stupid kid is trying to fuck your kid." Somehow that's not much better than an adult doing it except the adult should know better. A "kid" can still give my kid an std or get her pregnant. Or ya know, RAPE her.

    Just fucking gross all around.

    [–]our_team_is_winning 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    California law (and other places)

    SB 145 would eliminate automatic sex offender registration for young adults who have anal or oral sex with a minor. Instead, a judge would make the decision, just as they do now in cases involving vaginal intercourse.

    This bill does not change the fact that it is illegal for an adult to have sex with a minor. SB 145 was meant to affect cases where the minor is a teenager between ages 14 to 17, and the offender, an adult, within a 10-year age range.

    Within a 10 year age range! So 24 and 14 ??

    Our favorite asshole legislator:

    The bill's author, State Senator Scott Wiener, said the controversy over SB 145 was based on people's misunderstanding of the changes and some lies about it.

    Then he had the nerve to claim it was to protect gay people. Totally doesn't make it sound like men 24 are having sex with boys 14, does it?

    https://www.abc10.com/article/news/politics/newsom-controversial-sb-145-new-law/103-238a7155-93a3-4f30-9daf-5d277d7ac91e

    [–]our_team_is_winning 13 insightful - 1 fun13 insightful - 0 fun14 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    attempting to penetrate a prepubertal girl is akin to torture

    Men don't seem to grasp that at all. I think of all the Muslim men with their child brides entering Europe. The PAIN.

    Glad you wrote all that. What good comes of children having sex, smoking, drinking alcohol, etc.? I knew tons of people who did, beginning ages 12-14 (in the early 80s). Nothing like comforting your 14 year old friend through her pregnancy scare :( That was pre-AIDS too. I thought that post-AIDS more education was encouraging people to hold off or at least use condoms. Guess not.

    [–]kwallio 10 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 0 fun11 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

    I mean thats just you tho? No one in my 6th grade class had a bf or a gf, let alone doing sexual activity. (unless they were being molested by a relative which I certainly was). But the kids were not doing it to each other.

    [–]MarkJeffersonTight defenses and we draw the line 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    I think she's saying the attractions are still there naturally even though adults are usually in complete denial about such things. I mean, no one should be having sex at that age, but some vocabulary should still exist then to allow one to express these attractions without it automatically being attributed to abuse(much more common with SSA than OSA). It reminds me a bit of this comment.

    [–]reluctant_commenter 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Eh... I mean, I agree with you, but I think that might be an overly generous interpretation of the original comment. (I went and found it after it was removed)

    [–]DimDroog 10 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 0 fun11 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    My god, this is not right.

    They were children, not women, and it's not right that that happened to them.

    [–][deleted] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Your comment has been removed, pending SaidIt Admin review and approval.

    Please do not attempt to repost it, or edit the content, until further notice. Our mod team, or Admins, will update you as soon as we have further information.

    [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Update:

    Sexualizing children is against the TOS of SaidIt. There is a line between expressing your experience as a child with sexualization, and promoting it. Your comment crossed that line, and the removal stands.