you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]IridescentAnacondastrictly dickly 29 insightful - 1 fun29 insightful - 0 fun30 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

In Boston, as in other cities, Pride has fractured into several camps. One is made up of those who are happy to see Pride become a blander, more corporate, mass participation institution within America’s ever-expanding civic calendar. The second major bloc is made up of those who seek radicalism for its own sake, and who are desperate to rekindle what they see as the revolutionary origins of Pride. And so if gay rights is no longer radical, they insist, the LGBT movement must pour its energy and resources into causes that offer the possibility of militant politics—such as radical gender movements, the erasure of biological sex, anti-capitalism, demonization of Israel, extreme forms of “anti-racism,” pacifism, and police abolition. Even gays and lesbians, now seen as the “privileged” elite of the LGBT population, are the subject of suspicion, and even animosity.

As a member of the "privileged" elite, I've known for awhile there's a target on my ass. The alphabet soup people don't want my heteronormative lifestyle, and they kinda don't want me to have it either.

Fuck them, I don't want the freak show that LGBTQ+ (where the "+" probably includes MAPs) has become.

The corporate option may be bland but it least it leaves me alone.

[–]hufflepuff-poet 22 insightful - 2 fun22 insightful - 1 fun23 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

The alphabet soup people don't want my heteronormative lifestyle, and they kinda don't want me to have it either.

Fuck them, I don't want the freak show that LGBTQ+ (where the "+" probably includes MAPs) has become.

Such a privileged Western pov, in most of the world--a homosexual couple being able to build a boring "heteronormative" life together is illegal at best and a death sentence at worst.

I just want a boring happy life with my future wife!!! Not to burn down the world and rebuild it in the image of Gender Jesus 🙄

[–]DimDroog 16 insightful - 1 fun16 insightful - 0 fun17 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Such a privileged Western pov, in most of the world--a homosexual couple being able to build a boring "heteronormative" life together is illegal at best and a death sentence at worst.

Extremely privileged!

I like to remind these fucks that LGB people in Iran face a choice of being hung or transitioning.

They get dragged by motorcycles in their beloved Palestine.

INSTEAD of whining about pronouns and girl dick, maybe DO SOMETHING to about that instead!

Donate money to help them immigrate!

[–]DimDroog 18 insightful - 1 fun18 insightful - 0 fun19 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

The goal of any organization seeking "justice" should be the eventual demise of that organization!

I volunteer at a humane society.

I would LOVE it if they were no longer needed!

Would love it if poverty/homeless orgs were no longer needed too!

And if orgs protecting the environment were no longer needed!

You get the picture.

A world full of kindness and justice would mean no more of these would be needed. That's a whole bunch of money gone for the people who work for them.

[–]bopomofodojo 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The goal of any organization seeking "justice" should be the eventual demise of that organization!

Exactly, but then the Iron Law of Institutions kicks in and it all goes to hell.

[–]julesburm1891 12 insightful - 2 fun12 insightful - 1 fun13 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

The second major bloc are made up of those who seek radicalism for its own sake

I’m very curious what this lot would do with themselves if they got their way. If Israel was wiped off the map, we had no police, and we all lived on collectivized farms ruled by transwomen of color, what then? Would they still push for “radicalism for its own sake” or would they be happy? (What would radicalism even be in that case?)

[–]IridescentAnacondastrictly dickly 11 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 0 fun12 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Look to Queer Theory for the answer. That answer is "no" because QT always seeks transgression. When the boundaries move, so do the demands.

[–]julesburm1891 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Yes, but when you hit the limit, what happens? Is the new radical 120 Days of Sodom or is it being a monogamous, Christian capitalist?

[–]IridescentAnacondastrictly dickly 7 insightful - 7 fun7 insightful - 6 fun8 insightful - 7 fun -  (1 child)

Maybe that's what happened to me. My need for transgression was so extreme that I became a religious, monogamous capitalist.

Fuck you imma do what I want ... (checks notes) ... by leading an utterly conservative lifestyle. Take that, Mom & Dad!

[–]julesburm1891 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I have a friend who grew up with parents who chain-smoked and drank fairly heavily. Her rebellion is that she doesn’t drink or smoke and runs marathons. I suppose we all have that audacious, rebellious spirit here.