The article lacks meaningful context about what a "gender-neutral" dressing room would even be like, versus whatever they had already. But in any case, it smacks of wanting a certain color of M&Ms removed as a contractual condition (which as I recall was a bit of trolling put into contracts by the band who used that clause, to see if they were being read). I'd be not wanting to deal with that person anymore, either, since victimhood seems to be their agenda.

But...it needs more context. I don't get what the complaint is about. "Wrong" signs on a door? Fantastical imaginings? They could hear people who know they are male or female nearby? Can't imagine. Do not all dressing rooms have chairs, makeup, costumes, mirrors, lights? Etc.