you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]wafflegaffWoman. SuperBi. 17 insightful - 3 fun17 insightful - 2 fun18 insightful - 3 fun -  (4 children)

I don't know, but this one was definitely suitable for framing: https://archive.ph/2sSEV

Also, the 2020 woman is orders of magnitude hotter. Just one more example of TRAs not getting it. "Snotty pipsqueak" (2012) isn't sexy.

[–]Elvira95Viva la figa 13 insightful - 1 fun13 insightful - 0 fun14 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

They both pretty, the one on the right is more mature looking. In the end, calling that woman obese is bs.

[–]our_team_is_winning 11 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 0 fun12 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Have TRA now added "if fat women are women" to their vile "if Black women are women" crap? From the photos, I thought they were just saying "look, she put on some weight" -- how either picture relates to straight men being expected to prefer other men over women, I dunno!

[–]wafflegaffWoman. SuperBi. 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

They don't seem to understand adjectives very well. Neither "fat" nor "black" (or "skinny" or "white," etc.) is used before the word "woman" to try to describe someone as what they aren't. "Trans" is. It's similar to saying "ersatz" or "pseudo" or "approximate." Of course, those are realistic descriptions, which are forbidden. So it's easier to try to make their arguments look sound by inserting irrelevant comparisons.

[–]wafflegaffWoman. SuperBi. 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

My equation is pretty + the maturity of experience = hotter.