you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]wafflegaffWoman. SuperBi. 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

Sadly this could easily be a thing that someone actually did, if that someone was a narcissistic abuser; they typically have the emotional maturity of a young child. It's likely a CYA move because the deception actually did not have no consequences, so the abuser decided to strike first. They all do this shit. The very second they are called on their shit they whip out the nukes to try to make the other person look like the perp.

And yes, to any reasonably-rational, mature adult, this looks like utter nonsense because to us, it is so easy to see how immoral and unethical this is AND how it is likely to backfire.

That isn't a complexity of thought or self-reflection this type of abuser engages in. They just want to win at all costs. (Remember that guy who was recently living in the White House? Same deal. What we have here is a child in an adult's body, and that child is angry because the other kid doesn't want to play in the same sandbox anymore now that our perp child has been mean.)

[–]dramasexual 6 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 3 fun -  (6 children)

Remember that guy who was recently living in the White House?

He's not Voldemort. You can just say Trump.

[–]wafflegaffWoman. SuperBi. 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

I could, but I deliberately chose not to. I don't go by anyone else's specifications for how I refer to him, and you understood me anyway. The point was successfully made.

[–]dramasexual 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

But why? I fully get not liking the man but referring to him in bizarre ways to avoid saying his name is just childish.

[–]wafflegaffWoman. SuperBi. 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Seems like you might need to review this. Projecting your own stuff onto other people here isn't a meaningful contribution.

https://saidit.net/static/PyramidDebate.jpg

[–]dramasexual 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Replying to a criticism of your rhetoric with condescension and deflection isn't particularly high on the pyramid of the debate either, if we're really doing the "NO U" thing here.

[–]wafflegaffWoman. SuperBi. 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

You have picked the strangest hill to die on that there is, by trying to make something out of a humorous euphemism.

I can only assume that you supported Trump, else you would not be so incredibly offended by a matter-of-fact description of the location of his previous residence, which also happens to express humor via exasperation. Move along.

[–]dramasexual 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I can only assume that you supported Trump

You really can't. Being annoyed by childish behavior is not a "Trump supporter" trait, it's a general adult trait. And snorting incredulously at someone being stupid in my replies once a day or so is really not the sign of incredible soul-scarring offense you want it to be lmao.