you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]jim_steak 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I don't blame Butler personally, I find her - like many academics - dense and hard to read. I sort of doubt most gender people have actually read her. Honestly, I think the trans movement exists because pharmaceutical companies wanted to make money and perform experimental surgeries, and they funded LGBT organizations to manufacture the justification for that. If Butler didn't exist they would've just used some other line of reasoning.

[–]JulienMayfair[S] 11 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 0 fun12 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I get what you're saying, but I think one can look at the history and draw a line of influence from Butler to her followers, especially people like Wilchins and Feinberg, who were not only reading gender theory but were participating in things like the Camp Trans protest of MichFest and writing books about gender that were easier to understand.

As a comparable example, I was aware of Critical Race Theory as developed by Derrick Bell and Kimberlé Crenshaw. Now, I doubt a lot of people have actually read Bell's or Crenshaw's work, but you see people nevertheless believing received versions of those ideas and acting on them.