you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]wafflegaffWoman. SuperBi. 16 insightful - 2 fun16 insightful - 1 fun17 insightful - 2 fun -  (16 children)

I don't see any (obvious) bisexual people responding so...yeah no. As we keep saying, bisexuality does not mean "okay with mismatched parts." Pass.

[–][deleted]  (15 children)

[deleted]

    [–]ArthnoldManacatsaman🇬🇧🌳🟦 6 insightful - 12 fun6 insightful - 11 fun7 insightful - 12 fun -  (2 children)

    But there's only three sexualities.

    *seethes in aquesexual*

    [–]wafflegaffWoman. SuperBi. 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (11 children)

    It's simple. Keep terms out of this debate that don't apply. Bisexual doesn't apply. It's not "well it's the closest." Unless you'd like us to use "lesbian" and force it to mean that you are also attracted to trans women by default.

    Which is not what it means, and that's why I don't play along with abusing that term at your expense. I expect the same respect in return, instead of excuses for why people keep misusing the term.