you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]PatsyStoneMaverique 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

That's sarcasm, just a heads up.

[–]ChunkeeguyTeam T*RF Fuck Yeah[S] 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

More irony I think, but yes indeed.

[–]PatsyStoneMaverique 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Well, this guy is a very famous conservative Twitter diva in the U.S. and his style of humor is to ridicule leftists by quoting their own beliefs back at them in an absurd manner. It's intended as mockery, it's not an expression of his own beliefs.

[–]Chipit 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

...shouldn't they be confirming to their own beliefs? Thus robbing his man of his method?

[–]PatsyStoneMaverique 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Therein lies the joke, I think. The reason I felt the need to say something was that it was presented without context. You can't take that tweet at face value, as true as it is.

[–]Chipit 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

So the truth of a statement is invalidated by who says it?