METAWhy Do You Want To "Drop The T"?

submitted by [deleted] from self.LGBDropTheT

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]wendyokoopa1 17 insightful - 1 fun17 insightful - 0 fun18 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

I know my reason why we need to kick the T out may seem stupid but I think it's valid. 1) Women can't even have dating preferences without someone some where saying calling us possibly transphobic. Sorry but people have dating preferences. Number 2: Women's sports and other biological female areas being hijacked constantly Yes Thankfully that trans lost the weightlifting in the olympics but sadly the real loser there was the female kicked out from HER competition her moment in the spot light. But nope gotta appease the trans and their fans or god help them they'll whinge.

[–]Rainmanslim 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

One thing I've learned since the TRAs took over the alphabet is that "justice" and "fairness" are just pointless buzzwords in their eyes to be deployed at their own convenience to get what they want.

5 years ago it was all about women women women, then after George Floyd it was all about black men black men black men, and now that's gone out of vogue now it's all trans trans trans. And anyone from the previous groups who doesn't immediately drop their own issues and focus on the new one get branded as "traitors" and turned on.

[–]wendyokoopa1 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Yup. It's disgusting. Women are now losing so much to these disgusting perverted butt holes but nope that's suddenly OK. BTW it's not and I read on Twitter last night Surry UK dropped stonewall.

[–]Rainmanslim 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Good, the more people and places that drop stonewall the better. That place may have started out as an absolute net possitive for the lgbt community, but today they're causing a lot of long term damage.

[–]wendyokoopa1 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I don't disagree. They should have done harder gatekeeping.

[–]DimDroog 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I don't think they wanted to do harder gatekeeping, b/c Trans being oppressed= a money generating fund for them, if that makes sense.

Think about it: LGB people, at least in the West, are pretty much accepted.

They see this, and wonder where their next source of money is going to come from.

Mind you, they should have keep focusing on LGB issues, like homeless LGB, or their LGB sisters and brothers who are still murdered in other countries.

But that's not as glamorous is it?
It's too ugly, and it requires more work.

Frick them. Selfish and greedy.

[–]wendyokoopa1 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

No argument here.