you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted]  (5 children)

[deleted]

    [–]reluctant_commenter 19 insightful - 1 fun19 insightful - 0 fun20 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

    Lol that's so true though. Just everything about the phrase. Calling it a "genital preference" in the first place, and then specifying that "it's okay" with the following "but.." (sometimes) unspoken.

    [–][deleted] 23 insightful - 2 fun23 insightful - 1 fun24 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

    It's ok to have a sexual orientation, but have you considered conversion therapy?

    That's basically what it amounts to with varying degrees of aggression.

    [–]reluctant_commenter 14 insightful - 1 fun14 insightful - 0 fun15 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Yes!!!!! Exactly!!!!!!!!

    Omg lol, I might steal this. Almost tempted to make a meme about it. Maybe the "shaking hands" meme with "shaming people for their sexual orienation" at the center.

    [–]insta 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    I swear you could advocate genocide and the majority of the population would totally be open to it if the language you used was fluffy, intelligentsia sounding and gaslighting enough.

    [–]Neo_Shadow_LurkerPronouns: I/Don't/Care[S] 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Calling it a "genital preference" in the first place, and then specifying that "it's okay" with the following "but.." (sometimes) unspoken.

    The thing is: the ones who proposed the detachment of primary and secondary sexual characteristics were the TRAs themseves. In nature, this doesn't happen 99% of the time.