you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Elvira95Viva la figa 11 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 0 fun12 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

These studies asking people about sexual experience are stupid as you can find some many bicurios people, especially girls. That's not really representative of homosexuality. Homosexuality is exclusive same sex attraction, it's the exclusive same sex interest making you homosexual, not having had experience with same sex.

[–]Shales123[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Exactly my thoughts

[–]HelloMomo 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

To me it seems plausible that bi is the one-allele, heterozygous version, and full-on homosexuality is the two-allele, homozygous version.

[–]reluctant_commenter 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Well... I think that might be an oversimplification, right? AFAIK there is a strong genetic basis for sexual orientation, but not one single gene for sexual orientation, per se.