you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]motss-pb 26 insightful - 1 fun26 insightful - 0 fun27 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

My guess would be satire because an actual TRA wouldn't want to reference same-sex attraction at all. Sex is the bad word that they want us to memory-hole and replace with gender. Their PSAs condemning same-sex attraction as bigotry come in two varieties.

  1. "genital preferences are transphobic"

  2. "genital preferences are valid, BUT ... "

In both, sexual orientation has been replaced by "genital preference". The second version is essentially a "rules for thee but not for me" clause. It allows them to reject people for having the wrong genitals, but rejecting a trans person because they're trans is transphobic.

[–]DropItLikeItsHot 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Nailed it.