you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]MarkJeffersonTight defenses and we draw the line 16 insightful - 3 fun16 insightful - 2 fun17 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

People can and do exclude for being fat or thin, short or tall, by race, looks, age, size and shape(and all the minuetia) of primary and secondary sex characteristics, not to mention the things not body related, and yet excluding by trans identification is somehow NOT okay. Yanno, the old song and dance of 'unpack your bigoted preferences'.

I'll bet they'll never hold themselves to this same standard. Because apparently, almost all Trans exclude other Trans from their dating pool. Hey, I'm fine with that as well, but these TRAs definitely shouldn't be okay with that, based on their own shaming rhetoric about prejudice and inclusion.

Also, this site is annoying af on mobile. It keeps the huge title at the top, pointlessly taking up a third of the screen the whole time. Makes reading this long coercion apologist diatribe even more of a slog.

[–]Elvira95Viva la figa 16 insightful - 1 fun16 insightful - 0 fun17 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yeah, people exclude people for any kind of reason and its their natural right to exclude whoever they want since nobody own sex or company to anybody. But with trans, it seems like the right of consent and saying no doesn't exist.