you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Clitorisk 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

There are dozens of testimonies

So it's just anecdotes from people who allege to be AHS users?

Anyone on AHS is a full blown prick who harrasses people.

This isn't a universal truth or confirmed fact, and alleging that someone is engaging in harassing behavior does not give you the moral high ground to harass them.

[–]NeedMoreCoffee~=[,,_,,]=^_^= 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

What would consist as proof to you then? The FBI posting a full essay with pictures and arrows in crayon so you can follow?

[–]Clitorisk 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

Literally anything that couldn't be faked by creating an alt.

[–]NeedMoreCoffee~=[,,_,,]=^_^= 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

so i repeat, what would you consider proof ?

[–]Clitorisk 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Anything that links specific, individual users to specific harassment.

[–]NeedMoreCoffee~=[,,_,,]=^_^= 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

And how do you want to see that because according to you testimonies, videos and screenshots can be faked and are not to be trusted.

So again, attempt number 3, what would you consider proof? be specific.